Skip to main content

Cause Marketing and Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work For List

Fortune magazine just published its annual “100 Best Companies to Work for” list and I wondered, how many of these companies are also known for their cause marketing?

Regular readers know that I have found a strong correlation between the Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship 2011 CSR Index and whether or not the company was active in cause marketing.

By my reckoning six of the BCCCC CSR List made the top ten and 33 of the 50 companies listed did at least some cause marketing.

Fortune’s ‘100 Best’ list is a little trickier when it comes to cause marketing. Cause marketing almost always faces the consumer, but a good number of companies on Fortune’s list are B2B. There’s several law firms for instance, and multiple energy companies and construction firms.

Moreover, Fortune’s list includes a number of companies that are either regional in their focus or otherwise unfamiliar to me. Which is another way of saying that they may be cause marketers and I just don’t know about it.

Those caveats aside, I found that five of the top ten, and 25 overall do at least some cause marketing.

Here’s my list preceded by the ranking on Fortune’s list:

1 Google
4 Wegman’s Food Market
8 Recreational Equipment (REI)
9 CHG Healthcare Services
12 Mercedes Benz
14 Dreamworks Animation
16 Kimpton Hotels & Restaurants
22 The Container Store
32 Whole Foods Market
39 St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
46 Intel
49 Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
55 Men’s Wearhouse
57 Marriott International
60 American Express
61 Nordstrom
62 Build-A-Bear Workshop
63 General Mills
70 Teach for America
73 Starbucks
76 Microsoft
78 Publix Super Markets
79 Mattel
82 Hasbro
99 Darden Restaurants

Over the last five years, I’ve profiled cause marketing campaigns from about half of these companies in this space. Indeed, companies like Marriott and American Express were among cause marketing’s very earliest practitioners. Jerry Welsh at American Express coined and trademarked the phrase 'cause-related marketing.'

Others, especially the grocers Publix and Wegman’s, were pioneers as well. And if you put General Mills’ name in the search box above it will come up dozens of times.

Finally, I could use your help to make this list as complete an accurate as possible. Go to Fortune’s full list here. If there’s a company on Fortune’s list that should be on this list of cause marketers, please let me know. Either comment below or send me an email to aldenkeeneatgmaildotcom.

As you do so, bear in mind that I’m not looking for evidence of good corporate citizenship, or generous corporate philanthropy. I’m looking for evidence of active cause marketing. Link

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor