Skip to main content

Cause-Related Marketing for the Beautiful People

H.L. Mencken, the legendary cynic, wrote, “nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.” Recently James Surowiecki, in his book “The Wisdom of Crowds” says that’s probably false of Americans (or any group in the aggregate).

However, notwithstanding that, I do believe there’s a corollary that holds up very well: “you’ll make a mint catering to people who feel like outsiders.” Witness the success of the Harry Potter books and movies, for instance.

And so it’s with mixed feelings that I review this campaign from the website Net-A-Porter.com. Net-A-Porter.com, part fashion magazine and part catalog, supports Fashion Targets Breast Cancer (FTBC), a fundraising campaign of the Council of Fashion Designers of America Foundation.

There are also FTBC organizations in the UK, Ireland, Australia, Greece, Japan, Canada, and Portugal orgainized under different auspices. Since 1994, FTBC has raised more than $40 for breast cancer charities in 13 countries, the ad informs us.

The FTBC fundraising approach is that they invite a prominent designer to design some kind of clothing using the FTBC logo and then sell it at tony prices. The polo shirts at left are designed by Ralph Lauren and retail at the Net-A-Porter.com website for $75.

Now, I have nothing against willowy supermodels in bikinis and skin-tight shirts. I like Ralph Lauren. As a cause marketer I admire the price FTBC is asking for the shirts.

But something about this ad and this cause marketing approach makes me feel like an outsider, like an awkward high school boy who can’t get even a nod from the pretty prom queen.

So I ask, where’s the chic products for us fashion outsiders?

Comments

Unknown said…
I have been reading a little bit about your blog and appreciate there is a blog like this addressing cause marketing. There was a recent article in Media Post Publications that stated: "77% of shoppers say they would prefer to select a brand that supports a cause, all things being equal."

http://publications.mediapost.com/
index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&
s=71562&Nid=36715&p=446000

So how do companies appeal to consumers, clients, whom ever in a genuine and powerful way? A way that pulls them in? For me, the Net-A-Porter.com. ad is not appealing, like you said, it does not seem like something I would want to be part of. I am 23, I think fashion is fun and at one point I thought about modeling, but that ad does not speak to me. Why?

I think it is somewhat of balancing act.

One of our clients for the company I work for is Operation Kids. Working with non-profits and sponsors, cause-related marketing is often an objective as far as value proposition goes. Topics like this and corporate social responsibility will definitely continue to gain interest and attention.

Keep up the good work!

http://operationkids.wordpress.com/

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor