Skip to main content

Cause Marketing in Nigeria

It is with great pleasure I offer up this guest post from Yinka Olaito, a specialist in brand communication, social media, and business communication in Lagos, Nigeria. Yinka is the chief communication officer of Michael Sage Company in Lagos, and a trainer, speaker and fellow blogger. I asked him to address the topic of Cause Marketing in Nigeria. (That's part of the Lagos skyline on the left).

Cause marketing is not new to any tribe (industry, nation, state, or professional association). The challenge in implementing cause marketing is how to be involved, where to be involved and when to be involved in order to create right impression and get maximum value.

Most organizations involved in cause marketing often jump into it just to feel good or because they see other companies doing it. Many get involved in causes that the top management feel good about without any strategic consideration. We’ve seen misdirected cause involvement actually hurting corporate image and perception instead of adding value to the corporate brand loyalty, patronage.

Nigeria is exploding with different cause involvement. Before the recession many banking actors were frontline gladiators in cause involvement without adequate marketing of the cause. My understanding then was that most of their cause involvements were based on ‘just feeling good or to belong.’ Today the dust has settled and many of them have stepped back.

While it may be said that not every one of them got it wrong, the few that got it right did not sustain the tempo. We believe that accounted for why they could not maximize the benefit of loyalty and patronage that should have been the aftermath of the process. When getting involved in cause marketing, there is need to understand that cause marketing is not a feeling but a marketing discipline that requires strong strategic positioning and relevant skill to get the most out of the practice.

Today, telecommunication and few oil and gas brands remain the most visible brands involved in cause involvement and marketing. Another conglomerate, Dangote, owned by Nigeria’s richest man Aliko Dangote, also seems to be engaging in cause marketing. Some have suggested that like the banks, Dangote is spending more on the marketing than on the cause itself.

Among the telecommunication brands, MTN Nigeria seems to be getting it right with its Foundation. The foundation has invested in education and health and the impacts are lasting. Strictly speaking what they’re doing isn’t cause marketing, but certainly both parties are benefitting.

Here’s how we think Nigerian companies could improve the value of cause marketing:
  • Use cause marketing to build deeper relation: this will require strategy development. Also, many brands need to consider cause investment relevance to the brand.
  • Use it to increase brand loyalty.
  • Manage cause marketing efforts with such finesse that they can generate a long lasting brand loyalty.
One positive benefit of cause involvement and marketing is in its ability to increase brand positive perception. Many brands here in Nigeria still need to learn how to best take advantage of this benefit of cause involvement and marketing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor