Skip to main content

Cause Marketing From the Mouths of Kids

Last Friday I was a judge at my State’s DECA convention and a student suggested a way to track customer service that has real potential as a cause marketing overlay.

The case study that was given to the students I judged had to do with a chain of electronics superstores. In it the staff product knowledge was very high. Nonetheless, customer satisfaction was low because shoppers said they felt pressured to buy more than they needed or wanted.

DECA is a career and technical student organization for high school and college-aged young people. The organization hosts student competitions to help them improve their business acumen.

Almost all the kids I saw suggested more training for employees and so I pressed them a little. How would the company know if the training were paying off right now?

Almost all the kids I asked that question of suggested some kind of survey, but they were generally vague about how to conduct that it in a timely and effective fashion. Fair enough. I was asking high school kids to do college-level work.

One young woman, however, had an intriguing idea: poll customers at the end of the credit card transaction. The question would certainly need to be very straightforward: “On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate the customer service you received today?” And it could only be one question. Any more and the survey itself would negatively affect customer’s opinions of the service they had received during their visit.

Most people pay with credit or debit cards these days, especially for high-ticket items. So using the credit card terminal wouldn’t exclude many people. In addition, the programming likely wouldn’t be onerous and the results could be basically instantaneous.

But the transaction would nonetheless be over before they were asked the question. How to induce customers to spend the 15 or 20 seconds it would take to answer the one-question survey?

The student didn’t suggest this, but as a cause marketer the answer came readily to me. The company ought to offer a donation to a favored cause.

So after you sign the terminal or enter your pin for a debit card transaction you’d get a follow-up screen that says: “Answer one question and we’ll make a $0.50 cent donation to the Food Bank. On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate the customer service you received today?”

Or, you could ask the 'Ultimate Question.' "Based on today's visit, how likely are you to recommend (company) to your friends on a scale of 1-10?"

Now, companies that do a lot of transactions per day or who do much of their business in rushes would be reluctant to try this. Delays of 15-20 seconds per customer would dramatically lengthen checkout lines.

I have two responses.

Firs. It would be no big deal to randomize the survey, so that not everyone got the chance to answer it. Likewise, you could run the survey only during hours when transactions were relatively light.

Second. If one or more of your associates is having a bad day and customers are bearing the brunt of it, wouldn’t it be better to know that on the day it’s happening rather than weeks after the fact?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor