Skip to main content

Cause Marketing Puts Eyeglass-Maker Warby Parker in the Big Time

Warby Parker, which uses buy one-give one (BOGO) cause marketing as a key element of its positioning and marketing has officially hit the big time. Investors and the business press are taking note of the company’s 500 percent growth in 2011.

Since its founding in 2010 Warby Parker has sold stylish spectacles for $95. For every pair you buy the company gives a second pair to someone who needs them.

Since Warby Parker’s BOGO appeal emerged on the heels of TOMS Shoes BOGO, it’s easy to conclude that its BOGO was a case of me-to. But there’s more to the story than that.

Eyeglasses were invented in 1286 by Friar Giordano da Pisa. Ben Franklin added the bifocals in the 1780s. But aside from little things like adding gradient lenses or different coatings, there hasn’t been that much innovation in eyeglasses in the years since. (Although that may be changing with "Google glasses").
Link
Eyeglasses seem exactly like the kind of product that would be commoditized. And, yet, strangely, they haven't been. More surprising still, eyeglasses have crazy profit margins. Their markup isn’t just 100 percent like in clothing, but 10 to 20 times what they cost to manufacture!

There’s plenty of competition, to be sure, but not as much as TOMS faces with shoes. And for all the competition, there’s really only one dominant player, the $7 billion (sales) Italian company Luxottica Group, which owns Ray Ban, Persol, Oakley, LenCrafters and more. Luxottica is also an active cause marketer.

Warby Parkers founders, Neil Blumenthal, David Gilboa, Andrew Hunt and Jeffrey Raider, who were buddies at Wharton Business School, must have looked at the eyeglass market and salivated. But nothing I’ve said here so far wasn’t known by others. What Warber Parker did was to completely regrind the business model.

They made the look of Warby Parker glasses handsome enough that the fashion forward young man or women could confidently wear them. And the youth market was important early on as the brand gained traction. But let’s not kid ourselves, there’s plenty of places where you could find similarly-styled eyeglasses.

They also priced the glasses right. The materials and labor in glasses amount to a few bucks each. But who among us would trust our eyesight to glasses that cost, say, $10? Or even $25? No, $100 is about right.

They focused tightly on their own cost structure and sold online only. Until recently all of Warby Parker’s promotional efforts, as with TOMS Shoes, were via word of mouth.

But the kicker was the BOGO. While Warby Parker is building its brand, the BOGO makes it easier for prospective customers to try something unfamiliar. As the brand matures, the BOGO will help Warby Parker repel competitors.

Concludes Gwen Moran in her January 2012 profile in Entrepreneur magazine:

“Meanwhile, the company’s philanthropic commitments remain strong:

“It recently became a certified B Corporation and purports to be one of the few carbon-neutral eyewear brands in the world. ‘It was important to the four of us,’ Blumenthal says, ‘that if we were going to dedicate our life savings and our time to building an organization, we wanted to have a positive impact.’”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chili’s and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

I was in Chili’s today and I ordered their “Triple-Dipper,” a three appetizer combo. While I waited for the food, I noticed another kind of combo. Chili’s is doing a full-featured cause-related marketing campaign for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. There was a four-sided laminated table tent outlining the campaign on the table. When the waitress brought the drinks she slapped down Chili’s trademark square paper beverage coasters and on them was a call to action for an element of the campaign called ‘Create-A-Pepper,’ a kind of paper icon campaign. The wait staff was all attired in black shirts co-branded with Chili’s and St. Jude. The Create-A-Pepper paper icon could be found in a stack behind the hostess area. The Peppers are outlines of Chili’s iconic logo meant to be colored. I paid $1 for mine, but they would have taken $5, $10, or more. The crayons, too, were co-branded with the ‘Create-A-Pepper’ and St. Jude’s logos. There’s also creatapepper.com, a microsite, but again wi...

Part 2: How Chili's Used Cause-Related Marketing to Raise $8.2 million for St. Jude

[Bloggers Note: In this second half of this post I discuss the nuts and bolts of how Chili's motivates support from its employees and managers and how St. Jude 'activates' support from Chili's. Read the first half here.] How does St. Jude motivate support from Chili’s front line employees and management alike? They call it ‘activation’ and they do so by the following: They share stories of St. Jude patients who were sick and got better thanks to the services they received at the hospital. Two stories in particular are personal for Chili’s staff. A Chili’s bartender in El Dorado Hills, California named Jeff Eagles has a younger brother who was treated at St. Jude. In both 2005 and 2006 Eagles was the campaign’s biggest individual fundraiser. John Griffin, a manager at the Chili’s in Conway, Arkansas had an infant daughter who was treated for retinoblastoma at St. Jude. They drew on the support Doug Brooks… the president and CEO of Brinker International, Chili’s parent co...

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor...