Skip to main content

Using BOGO Cause Marketing to Sell Men's Razor's

A new e-tail website called Harrys.com launched last week with a BOGO cause marketing approach. Harry’s sells moderately-priced men’s shavers, giving the handles names and taking a boutique approach. If that sounds familiar it’s because Harrys.com was started by Warby Parker co-founder Jeffrey Raider.


BOGO means Buy One, Give One.

Harrys.com isn’t the first direct-to-consumer shaving company. Dollar Shave Company with its profane-a** commercials was into the space well before Harry's. And it’s easy to guess why; the business model is so classic, so bulletproof  it has its own name! The razor blade business model is why Proctor and Gamble paid $57 billion for Gillette back in 2005.

Of course, Procter and Gamble has tens of millions to spend on branding and advertising its razor products. No wonder Dollar Shave Company goes blue with its branding and advertising. How else to break through the clutter?

Well, one way is with cause marketing and BOGO. “We are passionate about helping everyone look and feel great, including those who might need a hand,” says the copy at Harrys.com. “So, for every pack of Harry’s blades that you buy, we donate one blade (or an equivalent dollar value) to an organization that supports our mission of helping people to look and feel great.”

Notice, in particular, the language that says, “helping people to look and feel great.” Harry’s sells to men right now, but the causes they want to support are gender neutral. Good thing, as we shall see.

“We have handpicked a group of amazing organizations,” the website continues, “that we deeply give a shave about, and will feature these organizations in the coming months so that they can benefit from our collective support.”

The first charity highlighted is The Mission Continues, which offers military veterans of recent wars 6-month long fellowships at nonprofit organizations.

Smart to pick a veteran’s charity as the first beneficiary. As I’ve often mentioned in this space, veteran’s charities poll very high in America right now.

Notwithstanding the many worthy charities that support veterans and their families and fire fighters and /police officers, nobody cares specifically about ‘men’ as a cause. If you’re a homeless man yes, that’s a cause we can all get behind. If you want a contract to help build California’s high-speed rail, the state may require you to hire male felons as part of the workforce.

But just men? Buck up, fellas, because you’re on your own.

Let me give you one example of what I mean. In Feb 2012, the unemployment rate in United States was 8.7 percent for men age 20 and older while the unemployment rate for women age 20 and older was 7.6 percent. That’s a difference of 1.1 percentage points.

And yet, I don’t remember anyone during that time starting a movement to get ‘men’ back to work. I don’t remember any legislation to erase the gender inequality in male vs. female unemployment. I don’t remember any charities being formed to retrain only men for the new economy.

Mind you, I’m not complaining. All I’m saying is that by themselves ‘men’ aren’t really a cause that anyone cares about.

We’ve reached the “end of men,” as Harry’s marketers seem to have realized.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor