Skip to main content

A Raspberry for Linens 'n Things Ad


An Ad that Tries to Do Too Much and Fails


Charities… even sophisticated and well-funded entities… are often guilty of trying to make their marketing collateral do too much. But in this ad for a multipart cause-related marketing promotion, it is the sponsor who muffs it by trying to do too much.

Here’s the list of vendors or corporate partners:

* Linens ‘n Things
* MasterCard
* Gund
* Homedics
* Yankee Candle
* + 2 unknown brands.

Here’s the list of potentially benefiting charities:

* National Breast Cancer Foundation, Inc.
* Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
* Val Skinner Foundation for Breast Cancer
* Breast Cancer Research Foundation
* + other potential but unnamed beneficiaries.

Here are the elements of the promotion:
* Add a dollar to your Linens ‘n Things purchase between October 1-31, 2006 (October is National Breast Cancer Awareness Month) and:
- Linens ‘n Things will match the donations up to $100,000
- MasterCard will match the donations up to an additional $100,000
- The total potential donation, therefore, is more than $300,000

Although the ad says “with the purchase of special items, a portion of the proceeds will go to foundations,” and provides the charities listed above, it’s not clear what those donation amounts are. When you go to LNT.com and view the items in the circular a popup box refers only to the add-a-dollar portion of the promotion.

The money, we are told, will fund free mammograms and breast cancer education, which is the primary mission of National Breast Cancer Foundation, Inc.

All this in a 6x9 ‘ad’ in a Linens ‘n Things circular.

Missing, of course, is which charities get what. Also missing is clarity about the donations apparently generated from the sales of the themed products.

What could have helped? A smarter approach would have been to split this ad up or lengthen it to a full page. Circular pages cost money, of course, and sponsors want to maximize their space. But if Linens ‘n Things shortchange a promotion that does, after all, presumably carry benefits for them, then they shortchange themselves as well as the benefiting charities.

Now, maybe the in-store promotional materials are more clear, but even if they are, this promotion was probably designed in part to drive traffic to the store. This ad doesn’t do that.

It also would help if the whole thing were a good deal more transparent. You couldn’t get all these details in the ad, but it could have directed readers to a micro-website that explains it in better detail and includes links and the like.

All in all, a raspberry to Linens ‘n Things for this overly-complicated ad.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor