Skip to main content

High-Dollar Product Marketers, Jump-In!





High-Dollar Cause-Related Marketing Comes of Age

Cause-related marketing has long been especially common in packaged goods promotions; Wish-Bone Dressing and Make-A-Wish or Yoplait and Susan G. Komen, to name just two. But does cause-related marketing work with high-dollar goods and services? More and more the answer is yes.

Above are four recent campaigns… from Dell, Oreck, American Century Investments, and Levenger… that increasingly demonstrate that cause-related marketing has legs even when the items in play cost hundreds or dollars or more.

Let me hasten to add that none of these high-dollar cause-related marketing promotions are exactly ‘first-movers.’

Ford and BMW have both done cause-related marketing promotions.

Kitchen Aid has long made special editions of their appliances in pink that generate donations for Susan G. Komen. They’ve also done straightforward ‘buy a qualifying dishwasher and we’ll donate $50 to Susan G Komen’ promotions.

Whirlpool… which owns Kitchen Aid… donates a refrigerator and a range for each new Habitat for Humanity home, but does not tie a donation to a purchase. Instead they use country music star Reba McEntire to solicit donations for Habitat. (They have also sponsored Reba’s tours.)

In October 2005 in the wake of Hurricane Katrina Oreck, which has a factory in Long Beach, Mississippi, not only kept their factory going, but housed employees and their families on the factory’s grounds. At that time, Oreck promised to give a matching vacuum to a family affected by Katrina for every Oreck sold. It was a ‘ten-bagger,’ to appropriate legendary investor Peter Lynch’s term, because it got their employees back to work and it put vacuums in the hands of people cleaning up after the devastation. Nice!

None of the high-dollar campaigns illustrated are exactly peerless in the execution of their promotion. Dell’s campaign promises to donate a portion of the proceeds to Susan G. Komen. ‘Proceeds’ is a mighty slippery word. Likewise, American Century Investment’s language that investments in the branded funds ‘can’ help support the mission of LiveSTRONG is just a few steps this side of weaselly. Levenger’s effort for the George Eastman House doesn’t exactly warm the cockles of my heart. And, I can’t shake the suspicion that Oreck merely raised the price of their special-edition vacuum $50 to cover the $50 donation to Susan G. Komen for demo’ing their vacuum.

But add these campaigns to the recently-reviewed campaign for Montblanc watches and it’s becoming clear that marketers and nonprofits are using tactical cause-related marketing to bring heart and customers to their high-dollar products and services. This makes perfect sense since surveys in the States have long shown that higher-income people are those most responsive to cause-related marketing.

So to marketers of high-dollar goods and services I say, there’s no longer a need to just dip your toe in. Cause-related marketing is a proven marketing tactic for your audience. Jump right it, the water's fine!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor