Skip to main content

Tarnished Halos

Why Company-Named foundations Benefiting from Cause-Related Marketing Rub Me the Wrong Way.

Just this month I’ve seen cause-related marketing campaigns for McDonalds and the Ronald McDonald House Children’s Charities; PETCO, and the PETCO Foundation; and, JC Penney and the JCPenney Afterschool Fund.

Two other general merchandise retailers, Kohls and Mervyns, run ‘charity-flavored’ campaigns through their community relations departments. The Kohl’s program, called Kohl’s Cares for Kids, supports child injury prevention and immunization programs, and children’s hospitals. Kohl’s Cares for Kids is not an actual charity, although like JCPenney Afterschool Fund it uses the sales of plush toys to fund their campaigns.

I don’t want this to be a 2,000-word post, so I’ll concentrate on the JCPenney Afterschool Fund. The organization, a 501(c)(3) public charity was formed in 1999 and “dedicated to ensuring that every child is safe and constructively engaged during the afternoon hours,” says the website.

Along with the National Football League, they sponsor the NFL Take a Player to School Sweepstakes for kids age 6-13. They also support the JCPenney JAM: Concert for America’s Kids. The June 2006 event was hosted by Dr. Phil and produced by fancy-pants Hollywood producer David Foster. Acts incuded Sting, Mary J. Blige, 3 Doors Down, Kenny Chesney and others. The concert along with behind the scenes footage is available from for $14.99.

“In 2006” the website informs us, the “JCPenney Afterschool Fund grants will provide over 10,000 children with access to safe, enriching aftershool programs,” through their partnerships with Boys & Girls Clubs of America, YMCA of the USA, National 4-H Council and United Way of America.

In 2005, the JCPenney Afterschool Fund’s audited financial statements said they took in $11.4 million and spent $6.5 million on program expenses. That is, they spent $6.5 million on their mission.

Why does this rub me the wrong way?

Because you and I are paying for all this. Everyone that attends the JCPenney Afterschool Fund’s annual gala, or buys the plush toys or the DVD of the JCPenney Jam is paying for it.

And while kids benefit, so too does the JCPenney corporation. Because by naming the charity the JCPenney Afterschool Fund, they ensured that their name gets plastered all over everything the charity does.

JCPenney corporate gets a halo and you and I pay for it.

Wait a minute, you say, cause-related marketing is about trading a nonprofit’s halo for a company’s cash. True enough. But I would argue that JCPenney is being too clever by half.

People instinctively realize that JCPenney is playing both sides of the fence. And so, while the cause-related campaigns apparently do fine I predict that they'll probably underperform. That is, that they could do even better if they weren’t tethered by the JCPenney name.

Secondly and ironically, the halo to JCPenney corporate would be bigger and brighter if the charity were not named for the company.


Anonymous said…
I think it is great if a company is doing a good thing and can benefit from it. The end result should be applauded. Think about how many children and families have been helped through similiar corporate programs. Don't take the wind out of thier sails. Give credit where credit is due.
Hi Anonymous:

Thanks for your comments.

I agree that corporate philanthropy needs to be encouraged at every turn.

Especially now at this writing (10/19/2009) when so many charities need help to fulfill their missions.

My argument in this post was not meant to discourage corporate philanthropy in any way. Quite the opposite.

I meant only to encourage companies to support nonprofit charities other than the ones with whom they share a common name.

I argued also that supporting their eponymous charities is in fact self-defeating because they don't receive the third-party endorsement implicit in supporting a non-affiliated charity.

Again, thanks for your comments.

Warm regards,

Popular posts from this blog

Three Ways to Be Charitable

I’ve spent a big chunk of my career working with or for charities. Many of my dearest and ablest friends are in the charity ‘space.’ And the creativity and problem-solving coming out of the nonprofit sector has never been greater.  Although I’ve had numerous nonprofit clients over the last decade or so, I haven’t worked in a charity for about 12 years now, which gives me a certain distance. Distance lends perspective and consequently, I get a lot of people asking me which charities I recommend for donations of money or time. My usual answer is, “it depends.” “On what?” they respond. “On what you want from your charitable activities,” I reply. It sounds like a weaselly consultant kind of an answer, but bear with me for a moment. The English word charity comes from the Latin word caritas and means “from the heart,” implying a voluntary act. Caritas is the same root word for cherish. The Jews come at charity from a different direction. The Hebrew word that is usually rendered as charity is t…

Top Eight Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns of 2007

Yeah, You Read it Right. It's a Top 8 List.

More cause-related marketing campaigns are unveiled every day across the world than I review in a year at the cause-related marketing blog. And, frankly, I don’t see very many campaigns from outside North America. So I won’t pretend that my annual list of the top cause-related marketing campaigns is exhaustive.

But, like any other self-respecting blogger, I won’t let my superficial purview stop me from drawing my own tortured conclusions!

So… cue the drumroll (and the dismissive snickers)… without further ado, here is my list of the eight best cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007.

My list of the worst cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007 follows on Thursday.

Chilis and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
I was delighted by the scope of Chilis’ campaign for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. As you walked in you saw the servers adorned in black co-branded shirts. Other elements included message points on the Chilis beverage coas…

Five Steps To Nurture a 30-Year Cause Marketing Relationship

Last Monday, July 22, 2013, March of Dimes released the annual results of its campaign with Kmart... now in its thirtieth year... and thereby begged the question, what does it takes to have a multi-decade cause marketing relationship between a cause and a sponsor?

In the most recent year, Kmart,the discount retailer, donated $7.4 million to the March of Dimes, bringing the 30-year total to nearly $114 million. March of Dimes works to improve the health of mothers and babies.

Too many cause marketing relationships, in my estimation, resemble speed-dating more than long-term marriage. There can be good reasons for short-term cause marketing relationships. But most causes and sponsors benefit more from long-term marriages than short-term hookups, the main benefit being continuity. Cause marketing trades on the trust that people, usually consumers, put in the cause and the sponsor. The longer the relationship lasts the more trust is evidenced.

There's also a sponsor finding cost that…