Skip to main content

Staples Easy Button Campaign Benefiting Boys and Girls Clubs of America


Cause Branding® Made Easy


Years ago Carolyn Cone and her eponymous Boston agency Cone, Inc., started using the term “Cause Branding®:” branding cause marketing, as it were.

I don’t think she or Cone, Inc. had anything to do with Staples Easy Button campaign.
If not, then at least Staples owes a debt of gratitude to Carol Cone because this campaign is a fine example of Cause Branding®.

In the States there are three national office supply superstores: Staples, Office Depot and the much smaller OfficeMax. Staples invented the business model and remains the largest company as well as the class of the bunch. Its stock has outperformed its competitors… as well as the broader stock market… and its growth prospects are superior.

Staples has countless other competitors including wholesalers and regional and local suppliers and stores. It’s a crowded marketplace, in other words.

So Staples began to do what any self-respecting marketing-driven company would do, they begin to brand themselves to break free from the clutter. Their positioning is that using Staples services and products is “easy.” In a series of witty ads they show people in office and other settings hitting a big red Easy Button to cut through the usual baloney of office-life.

On the Staples website you can watch the commercials, download them to your iPod, view the outtakes, even play Easy Button-themed computer games.

Now in an homage to Cause Branding®, that same Easy Button is available for sale in Staples stores and online. The product, in English and Spanish versions, costs $4.98 and proceeds from the sale of the product benefit Boys and Girls Clubs of America up to $1 million a year.

When you press the Easy Button a voice intones in English (or Spanish if you bought that version), “That Was Easy.’

This is Cause Branding® the way Carol Cone dreamed it up. The customer gets a cute gimmick that’s been featured on the hit TV show The Office, the company’s branding is extended, the cause is supported in a meaningful way, and a halo extends from Boys and Girls Clubs of America to Staples.

That said, I have some quibbles. The proceeds language is weak and confusing. Better to just say what the donation will be. The point of purchase (POP) display in the stores, which is illustrated above, is subtle to the point of being underwhelming. And it’s not clear to me why Staples is running the promotion through their company foundation… the Staples Foundation for Learning… and giving that entity equal billing on their POP materials and their website. Truth be told, I struggle to find any external advantage to branding their foundation at all in the promotion. Finally, it wouldn’t hurt Staples to expend a little more effort explaining the mission of Boys and Girls Clubs and its impact on kids on the POP and website.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor