Skip to main content

Window's Live Messenger and Multiple Charities

Tech Companies: Steal This Idea from Mr. Softy!

I’M intrigued by the new cause-related marketing campaign Microsoft is promoting right now called the “i’m Initiative.” Sign up with the i’m Initiative in the United States and every time you use Window’s Live Messenger Microsoft will make a donation to one of nine designated charities.

The money for the donation comes from splitting ad revenue, which echoes the way Seth Godin’s Squidoo.com makes charitable donations.

As currently constituted the nine charities are: American Red Cross; Boys & Girls Clubs of America; The National Aids Fund; National Multiple Sclerosis Society; ninemillion.org; The Sierra Club; StopGlobalWarming.org; Susan G. Komen; and UNICEF.

The most recent survey of IM users that I’m familiar with comes from the Pew Internet & American Life Project, published in September 2004. They found that 42 percent of American Internet users, or 53 million people, used IM. The heaviest usage is among Gen Y (age 18-27). Pew reported that 46 percent of Gen Y used IM more than email and that the largest portion of people…35 percent… who use IM for an hour or more a day are Gen Yers.

In short, IM appeals to Gen Y the way a welcoming barnyard appeals to farm animals.

Microsoft’s signup page is certainly illustrated with Gen Yers, leading me to believe that’s their target with this promotion.

There’s a lot to like here. There’s no cap on the amount that can go to one of the nine charities, but all are guaranteed a minimum of $100,000 this first year. Likewise, as of right now, the i’m Initiative will be a permanent part of their business plan. That, too, is reminiscent of Squidoo.com. They've also built in a capacity for Live Messenger fans to spread the word virally using the theme "i'm making a difference."

I have two small reservations.

The mix of charities is a curious one if they are indeed targeting Gen Y. The Red Cross, MS Society, UNICEF… and to a lesser degree the Sierra Club and Susan G. Komen… are slightly fusty choices. I’m not saying they’re unworthy of the program’s support (or your support or mine, for that matter). Only that these causes are most likely to appeal to an older generation. But maybe Microsoft is just hedging its bets that older people will sign up, too.

My second reservation has to do with having to choose just one charity to support. Unless I’m missing something, it seems to me like it would be a simple matter to allow someone to support multiple charities at once; say, The Sierra Club and StopGlobalWarming.org. Or, the Red Cross, UNICEF and ninemillion.org. Why not allow the option to split on a percentage basis the revenue generated by each call among multiple charities? Or, why not split it by month such that UNICEF gets the proceeds from your messaging in January, the National AIDS Fund in February, etc.?

I'M in hopes that this promotion will fly. Because just as Mr. Softy has borrowed a page from Squidoo, there will be a lot of web-based endeavors that will steal from Microsoft if it works.
Labels:

Comments

Tutor Mentor Connections said…
I think it's great that Microsoft is using a business goal to stimulate a charitable goal. I just wish they'd use the technology available through the internet to point donors to all of the charities working in the US or the world, and let donors choose which ones to give to.

By picking the few brand name chariteis on the list the rich get richer and the small non profits working in neighborhoods all over the world continue to struggle to find resources.

This could change if doners were pointed to directories listing all chairites, with sort features that could narrow down choices by cause, or by zip code. Thus, if someone chose a zip code of Chicago without a Boys & Girls Club, maybe other youth serving organizations in that area would get some help.

I host a Program Locator at http://www.tutormentorconnection.org that illustrates how maps and databases could help donors focus on all charities in a single category in a big city, rather than just the few brand name groups.

There's many areas where this same concept could be applied, and would lead to a better distribution of resources to more place.
5/04/2007 11:39 AM
Anonymous said…
We have exactly what you seek. We have a search engine that benefits charities. Most of the money on the internet is made by search engines. What we've done is set up a search engine with 2 added features. First, the ad revenue we collect is shared with charities. Second, you can select which charity you want to benefit. It is no cost to you or your favorite charity and if your charity is not in our databesa, you can add it. It's called Searchgive.com. I hope you like it.
5/07/2007 2:13 PM
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
7/24/2011 12:25 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Batting Your Eyelashes at Prescription Drug Cause Marketing

I’m a little chary about making sweeping pronouncements, but I believe I've just seen the first cause marketing promotion in the U.S. involving a prescription drug. The drug is from Allergan and it’s called Latisse , “the first and only FDA-approved prescription treatment for inadequate or not enough eyelashes.” The medical name for this condition is hypotrichosis. Latisse is lifestyle drug the way Viagra or Propecia are. That is, no one’s going to die (except, perhaps, of embarrassment) if their erectile dysfunction or male pattern baldness or thin eyelashes go untreated. Which means the positioning for a product like Latisse is a little tricky. Allergan could have gone with the sexy route as with Viagra or Cialis and showed lovely women batting their new longer, thicker, darker eyelashes. But I’ll bet that approach didn’t test well with women. (I’m reminded of a joke about the Cialis ads from a comedian whose name I can’t recall. He said, “Hey if my erection lasts longer than ...
4 comments
Read more

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chili’s and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

I was in Chili’s today and I ordered their “Triple-Dipper,” a three appetizer combo. While I waited for the food, I noticed another kind of combo. Chili’s is doing a full-featured cause-related marketing campaign for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. There was a four-sided laminated table tent outlining the campaign on the table. When the waitress brought the drinks she slapped down Chili’s trademark square paper beverage coasters and on them was a call to action for an element of the campaign called ‘Create-A-Pepper,’ a kind of paper icon campaign. The wait staff was all attired in black shirts co-branded with Chili’s and St. Jude. The Create-A-Pepper paper icon could be found in a stack behind the hostess area. The Peppers are outlines of Chili’s iconic logo meant to be colored. I paid $1 for mine, but they would have taken $5, $10, or more. The crayons, too, were co-branded with the ‘Create-A-Pepper’ and St. Jude’s logos. There’s also creatapepper.com, a microsite, but again wi...
11 comments
Read more