Skip to main content

Pimping for Constant Contact

OK, not pimping really. More like a gentle noodge to nonprofits and the companies that love them that it’s time to start email marketing.

I was invited to a local presentation on email marketing from Constant Contact, the Waltham, Massachusetts email marketing outfit whose target market is small businesses and nonprofits.

They offer a cause-related marketing campaign called Care4Kids meant to benefit children’s causes. Constant Contact customers are invited to nominate worthy 501(c)(3) children’s charities to receive a free account along with the training to create an effective email campaign.

Non children’s charities are probably still eligible for charity discounts. If you’re outside the United States you might be able to induce Constant Contact to consider your cause. Alternately, you could suggest a similar program to email marketing vendors in your home country.

It goes without saying… I hope… that every nonprofit needs an email marketing component. Email marketing is a good deal like direct mail fundraising efforts, only cheaper and more trackable. You’ll know in hours rather than days if a campaign worked. If it didn’t work you can rejigger and have the next campaign ready to go just a few more hours later. It’s a continuous feedback loop.

And like John Arnold, the instructor and author of “Email Marketing for Dummies” said, if someone likes your enewsletter they may forward it to others. But have you ever heard of someone making a copy of a direct mail piece to give to their friends?

Now strictly speaking Care4Kids is more a charitable donation than cause-related marketing. They could make it more of a cause-related marketing by offering donations to charities when new companies sign up, to cite just one possibility.

Bottom line; if you’re a nonprofit and don’t have an email marketing campaign in place, it’s time to get started. And you gotta admit that free is a pretty good price.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Paul,
I'd like to thank you for your kind words about Cares4Kids. We're certainly very proud of the program here. I did want to add one point of clarification to your post… The program was designed to provide all of our customers with a way that they could sponsor a local non-profit organization that helps children regardless of where they live. In fact, we have a number of customers in the US that have sponsored organizations helping children in Africa. So no matter where you live or whom you would like to help, if you are a customer of Constant Contact and you want to help an organization that helps children with social or educational programs the Cares4Kids program is the place to turn.

Eric Groves
Constant Contact
Lateef said…
Thanks for mentioning the importance of email marketing - I'm absolutely amazed by the level of ineffective emails I continue to receive from nonprofits - I think it's important for nonprofit staff to think of ROI and user-experience just as for-profit businesses consider.
Jenna Gross said…
I totally agree with your post - also, check out www.LoyalRewards.com -- they set up the email campaign for you

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor