Skip to main content

Is Wal-Mart Really Turning Green?

I have watched the plentiful news coverage about Wal-Mart’s green turn and read many opinions both skeptical and convinced. Until now I have withheld judgment.

Talk, after all, (mine included) is cheap.

But it seems increasingly clear that Wal-Mart is not…as the doubters say… just ‘greenwashing’.

How did I come to this conclusion?

Well I read a number of feature stories in the American business press, for one. And one of the common threads is that Wal-Mart has discovered that by trimming packaging, excising unnecessary waste, and maximizing energy costs they are saving tens of millions every year.

Wal-Mart’s unique business proposition is that they are the low price leader and their margins are razor-thin. “A penny saved is a penny earned,” the saying goes. And that’s truer for Wal-Mart than, say, Rolls Royce.

To its bones, Wal-Mart is a cost-cutter.

But I also keep coming across marketing efforts... ironically enough... that evidence Wal-Mart is serious in its greening.

Above is a page from a flyer from the June-July 2007 Sam’s Club Source, their magazine for members. Sam's Club is a member's only warehouse club owned by Wal-Mart. All told 40 pages of editorial and ads… including the cover… had some sort of green or organic or social responsibility messaging.

Notice first of all the three column piece at the top of the page about Sam’s Club gift cards. The plastic cards, we learn, are made from corn sugars and thereby decompose (‘renew’ the copy says), in days rather than millions of years as with an oil-based plastic.

Two years ago the main consideration from Sam’s Club when it comes to sourcing stored-value cards would have been price alone.

Below that is an ad for coffee from Sam’s Club in-house premium brand Member’s Mark. The coffee is triple certified by the Rain Forest Alliance, USDA Organic and Fair Trade.

Two years ago, the coffee buyers at Sam’s Club wouldn’t have even deigned to open a phonebook to find the numbers for the USDA Organic certification authority, much less Fair Trade and the Rain Forest Alliance.

Likewise Sam’s Club and Wal-Mart have traditionally rejected standard-issue cause-related marketing campaigns because they undercut the company’s value proposition, which was encapsulated by their long-time tagline “always the lowest price.” [Wal-Mart’s tagline has since changed to: “Save money. Live Better.”]

After all, how could they be offering the lowest price if some charity got a nickel or two?

What does this mean?

Two things:
  1. Wal-Mart is the world’s first or second largest company by sales depending on the year. In no small measure their size has painted them with an equally gigantic target. And competitors, governments, and social activists the world over take aim every day. With their green initiatives, they’re not going to please their fiercest critics. But if they can find money savings and sales advantages in turning green, your company can too.
  2. For cause marketers it means that you may have an opening… most likely with Sam’s Club… that didn’t exist before. But the cause has to be just the right shade of green and the campaign better be very well thought out. Because every day a plane-load of people with new ideas arrives in Bentonville, Arkansas and most go home disappointed.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor