Skip to main content

Top Eight Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns of 2007

Yeah, You Read it Right. It's a Top 8 List.

More cause-related marketing campaigns are unveiled every day across the world than I review in a year at the cause-related marketing blog. And, frankly, I don’t see very many campaigns from outside North America. So I won’t pretend that my annual list of the top cause-related marketing campaigns is exhaustive.

But, like any other self-respecting blogger, I won’t let my superficial purview stop me from drawing my own tortured conclusions!

So… cue the drumroll (and the dismissive snickers)… without further ado, here is my list of the eight best cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007.

My list of the worst cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007 follows on Thursday.


Chilis and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
  • I was delighted by the scope of Chilis’ campaign for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. As you walked in you saw the servers adorned in black co-branded shirts. Other elements included message points on the Chilis beverage coasters, a paper icon campaign, a micro-website, a sweepstakes element, and branded merchandise. At the time I wrote that it was a few tweaks short of perfection. And I was right. All told it raised more than $8.2 million in this its third year at a national level. Later this month I’ll post in greater depth about this well-executed campaign.
MAC Aids Fund
  • MAC, which makes high-end cosmetics, does a cause-related marketing campaign few companies could/would dare to match. “Every cent of the selling price of MAC Viva Glam Lipstick and Lipglass is donated to the MAC AIDs Fund to support men, women and children living with HIV and AIDs,” their ads point out. Plus their ads… featuring models and actresses… make the sexiest use of any of the celebrity supporters I saw in 2007.
Lay’s Destination Joy and Make-A-Wish
  • I liked the many layers of this promotion between the salty snack maker and Make-A-Wish, the charity that grants wishes to ill children. There were a lot of moving parts…a standard buy a bag make a donation element; celebrities; an awareness-raising piece; plenty of media, including PR and on-package promos; special events; an online auction; and, retail fundraising… but they were well integrated. I touted the promotion as reason enough to always include an “ancillary opportunities” in your sponsorship proposal.
Open Source Cause-Related Marketing X2

Twice in 2007 I described cause-related marketing promotions as being reflective of the ‘open source movement,’ a term usually applied to software and meaning that the source code for a piece of software is available to users.
  • The first time I used the expression was in praise of General Mills’ Box Tops for Education campaign. Not too long ago only General Mills brands could use the promotion which was developed in house. In 2006 General Mills opened the campaign to non-competing brands including Scott paper towels, Hefty disposable plates, Ziploc, Huggies, Land’s End, J.C. Penney, and others. General Mills still owns the copyright, but Box Tops for Education now belongs all the sponsoring brands, not just those from General Mills. As a result, the campaign has grown explosively.
  • I also praised the breast cancer charities for not ‘tying up’ the ownership of the pink breast cancer ribbon. I looked, but could not find any evidence that the emblematic pink ribbon by itself was trademarked in the United States. The result is that any entity… for-profit or not-for-profit… can use it. Any entity can also abuse it, too. Nonetheless, the paradox is that because no one owns the pink ribbon, it’s more valuable!
Cantilena Music
  • I wasn’t crazy about the vagueness of the mission of the Cantilena Music Foundation, which is associated with the company called Cantilena Music. But I did like their direct, appropriate, and strategic cause marketing campaign. When you commission music from Cantilena, they direct 15 percent of the total to the foundation, which supports deaf children in North America and abroad. Since the price of a commission from Cantilena ranges from just under $2,000 to more than $5,000, this is a meaningful donation.
Email a Duck, Raise a Buck
  • There was a cute Web 2.0 element in this small campaign from the company Munchkin, Inc. In the campaign you could create a virtual Munchkin rubber duck and email it to friends. Every time someone opened it, a nickel went to the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, up to $10,000. You could track your duck’s movement on the website. The name, “email a duck, raise a buck” was a problem, since a duck email had to be opened 20 times to raise a buck. Still I liked the Web 2.0 aspect to it.
Get Away Today Vacations and Credit Unions for Kids
  • Even though they break one of my cardinal rules for cause-related marketing, namely transparency, I had great admiration for the campaign from Get Away Today Vacations. By trading on the reputation of credit unions and Children’s Miracle Network, Get Away Today Vacations, a travel agency and vacation packager, has been able to very quietly raise a noisy $1 million.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor