Skip to main content

'Free' and Cause-Related Marketing: Part II

Tuesday’s post was about the increasing use of ‘free’ as a business model. No less a company than Google is built on ‘free.’ So are Craigslist and Facebook and Flickr.

And free is coming on like a lion.

AOL used to be primarily a subscription-based service. But every year their subscriber base shrinks. Nowadays, as a free portal, is the fourth most-visited Web property. The mighty Wall Street Journal’s online version had a subscription model. But Rupert Murdoch, who recently purchased the Journal, announced that it will soon be largely free. It will no doubt grow as a result.

As Chris Anderson writes in his cover story, “Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business,” in the March 2008 Wired magazine:
“People think demand is elastic and that volume falls in a straight line as price rises, but the truth is that zero is one market and any other price is another. In many cases, that's the difference between a great market and none at all.”

“The huge psychological gap between "almost zero" and "zero" is why micropayments failed. It's why Google doesn't show up on your credit card. It's
why modern Web companies don't charge their users anything. And it's why Yahoo
gives away disk drive space. The question of infinite storage was not if but when. The winners made their stuff free first.”

Fair enough for the for-profit folks. But as I asked in Tuesday’s post, “is free sustainable or even possible for organizations that are already not-for-profit?”

Many of you thought for a moment and answered, “Well, yeah. In fundraising nonprofits use ‘free’ all the time. And it works great.”

I’ve got a drawer full of proof at home.
  • In my desk at home I have a drawer full of free-to-me address labels from perhaps a half-dozen nonprofits. I’ve gotten pens, bumper stickers, key fobs, notepads, and more. Nonprofits send out those giveaways because experience clearly demonstrates that an envelope with something free in it generates more than does an empty envelope.
  • In the United States the public radio and television are both supported by periodic public appeals that draw heavily on premiums. Donations in a certain range come with valuable items like books, tapes, meals, lodging stays, events with celebrities, and more. The telethon producing charities do much the same, especially at the local level.
  • Paper icons, usually priced at $1 in North America, sometimes come with price-saving coupons. And so the purchase price might bring $5 or more dollars in coupon savings. Some charities do much the same with calendars.
  • A few months back I went to a free performance from best-selling author and humorist Andy Andrews that was sponsored by a nonprofit as a 'friend-raiser.' (He was dynamite, BTW. The best 90 minutes I've spent in the last year). In April Andrews will return to a larger venue for another friend-raiser, also free.
In fact, notwithstanding business cases like Gillette (where since the company’s founding in 1903 Gillette razor handles typically cost a pittance, but the blades are a pretty penny) nonprofits have been using the concept of free longer and with greater success than most for-profits. ‘Free’ is baked deeper into the DNA of nonprofits than it is in any flavor-of- the-month tech company.

Nonprofits understand better than most companies that ‘free’ doesn’t mean ‘no expense.’ Nonprofits know that in their fundraising they while they can and should give stuff things away to boost their fundraising. (Reread the material under the heading ‘Taxonomy of Free’ in Anderson's Wired article for a refresher on how to pay for and think about ‘free.’)

And finally, nonprofits understand that among the many things they can give away free the most important may be the feeling that their supporters are doing something good.


Popular posts from this blog

Three Ways to Be Charitable

I’ve spent a big chunk of my career working with or for charities. Many of my dearest and ablest friends are in the charity ‘space.’ And the creativity and problem-solving coming out of the nonprofit sector has never been greater.  Although I’ve had numerous nonprofit clients over the last decade or so, I haven’t worked in a charity for about 12 years now, which gives me a certain distance. Distance lends perspective and consequently, I get a lot of people asking me which charities I recommend for donations of money or time. My usual answer is, “it depends.” “On what?” they respond. “On what you want from your charitable activities,” I reply. It sounds like a weaselly consultant kind of an answer, but bear with me for a moment. The English word charity comes from the Latin word caritas and means “from the heart,” implying a voluntary act. Caritas is the same root word for cherish. The Jews come at charity from a different direction. The Hebrew word that is usually rendered as charity is t…

Top Eight Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns of 2007

Yeah, You Read it Right. It's a Top 8 List.

More cause-related marketing campaigns are unveiled every day across the world than I review in a year at the cause-related marketing blog. And, frankly, I don’t see very many campaigns from outside North America. So I won’t pretend that my annual list of the top cause-related marketing campaigns is exhaustive.

But, like any other self-respecting blogger, I won’t let my superficial purview stop me from drawing my own tortured conclusions!

So… cue the drumroll (and the dismissive snickers)… without further ado, here is my list of the eight best cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007.

My list of the worst cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007 follows on Thursday.

Chilis and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
I was delighted by the scope of Chilis’ campaign for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. As you walked in you saw the servers adorned in black co-branded shirts. Other elements included message points on the Chilis beverage coas…

Five Steps To Nurture a 30-Year Cause Marketing Relationship

Last Monday, July 22, 2013, March of Dimes released the annual results of its campaign with Kmart... now in its thirtieth year... and thereby begged the question, what does it takes to have a multi-decade cause marketing relationship between a cause and a sponsor?

In the most recent year, Kmart,the discount retailer, donated $7.4 million to the March of Dimes, bringing the 30-year total to nearly $114 million. March of Dimes works to improve the health of mothers and babies.

Too many cause marketing relationships, in my estimation, resemble speed-dating more than long-term marriage. There can be good reasons for short-term cause marketing relationships. But most causes and sponsors benefit more from long-term marriages than short-term hookups, the main benefit being continuity. Cause marketing trades on the trust that people, usually consumers, put in the cause and the sponsor. The longer the relationship lasts the more trust is evidenced.

There's also a sponsor finding cost that…