Skip to main content

Cause Marketing in the Economic Downturn

Get Your Chin off Your Chest


It’s probably just superstition, but I have steadfastly avoided posting anything about the recession.

After all, considering the amount of liquidity sloshing around after all the actions already taken by central bankers in Asia, Europe, and the United States, it’s plain that the real problem right now isn’t access to capital. The problem is one of confidence.

This is just one small little blog on the semi-obscure topic of cause marketing, but I see little reason to pile on.

So, assuming that the economy doesn’t turn into Oklahoma circa 1935 (Dustbowl deflation) or the Weimar Republic of 1923 (hyperinflation), this will be my first and last posting on the topic of the economy.

In the States, economists are struggling with exactly which recession to compare this one to. Is it like the downturns of 2000, 1980 and 1974? Is it a second Great Depression? (Short answer: No. For one thing, unemployment was 25 percent in the States in 1933.) Could it be an analog to Japan’s “Lost Decade” from 1991-2001?

But like all things economic, we won’t know for sure what it was until after the fact. What a gig the practitioners of the ‘dismal science’ enjoy.

Which reminds me of a joke:
A woman hears from her doctor that she has only half a year to live. The doctor advises her to marry an economist and to live in North Dakota. The woman asks:
“will this cure my illness?” The doctor replies: “No, but the half year will seem pretty long.”
Already, leading indicators suggest that cause marketing, social marketing, and corporate philanthropy are in decline.
  • A September study from Duke University finds chief marketing officers paying less attention to campaigns that “promote benefits to society.”
  • Small businesses are enthusiastic about corporate philanthropy, but nonetheless giving less.
  • Starting in 2007, all charitable giving in the United States, including corporate giving, did not keep pace with inflation, although it did increase in terms of actual dollars.
But, Giving USA also finds that since 1969, giving has risen every year in the United States except 1987, which featured an odd blip in the tax laws.

What are cause marketers to do in this confusing economic climate? After all, cause marketing… which was invented (more or less) in 1983… has never been through a recession or a sustained downturn. We have no history to guide us.

Absent any historical guidance, I humbly offer five thoughts:
  1. I still find persuasive the all-but-real-life findings from the Duke/Cone behavioral study that demonstrate that cause marketing works to increase sales.
  2. More than ever it’s clear that the matches between causes and companies have to be explicitly clear. In this economy, it’s unrealistic to expect customers to make any leaps of logic between a company, a campaign, and a cause.
  3. Likewise, I think transparency about how donations are determined in a cause marketing campaign, and how the donated money is used, is more vital than ever.
  4. To be cost-effective, cause marketing must rely more on PR, social media, and word-of-mouth/guerilla marketing.
  5. Get your mopey chin off your chest. Many great fortunes are made in bad economic times.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Paul-

Great points made during a time when most want to shy away from the topic.

Cause marketing leaders recognize that business and society are linked, and therefore have a unique challenge and opportunity to make a positive impact on society, while also boosting short-term sales, long-term reputation gains and stakeholder loyalty.

While some will inevitably shift their focus away from cause branding, there is a renewed opportunity today for the staunchest supporters to reaffirm their commitments to social and environmental issues and break through the cause clutter.

If you are interested, we recently posted our thoughts about the state of the economy and Cause Branding on our Web site: http://www.coneinc.com/causeandeconomy

Thank you for your insight and for starting the tough conversation!

-Casey Brennan, Insights Coordinator, Cone LLC
Anonymous said…
I loved that joke, but it's not really fair to North Dakota. :)
Paul Jones said…
Hi Jordy:

You're right, I shoulda used South Dakota ;>

Paul

Popular posts from this blog

Pimping for Constant Contact

OK, not pimping really. More like a gentle noodge to nonprofits and the companies that love them that it’s time to start email marketing. I was invited to a local presentation on email marketing from Constant Contact, the Waltham, Massachusetts email marketing outfit whose target market is small businesses and nonprofits. They offer a cause-related marketing campaign called Care4Kids meant to benefit children’s causes. Constant Contact customers are invited to nominate worthy 501(c)(3) children’s charities to receive a free account along with the training to create an effective email campaign. Non children’s charities are probably still eligible for charity discounts. If you’re outside the United States you might be able to induce Constant Contact to consider your cause. Alternately, you could suggest a similar program to email marketing vendors in your home country. It goes without saying… I hope… that every nonprofit needs an email marketing component. Email marketing is a good dea

The Alden Keene Cause Marketing Stock Index Dramatically Outperforms Other Indices

There are stock indexes galore; the Dow, S&P 500, the NASDAQ Composite, the Wilshire 5000, the FTSE, and hundreds more. But how would an index of the stocks of companies that do a meaningful amount of cause marketing perform compared to those well-known indexes? Pretty well, as it turns out. I first floated the idea of a stock index that would track companies that do cause marketing back in 2009 . I tried to figure out Yahoo Pipes so that I could put the feed right into this blog. But alas sometimes the geek gene does fall pretty far from the tree. So I talked to programmers to see if I could find someone who could do the same, but it was always more than I was willing to pay. Finally, last week I hired a MBA student to do it all in a spreadsheet, and what do you know but that over the last 15 years a basket of 25 cause marketing stocks dramatically outperforms the Dow, the S&P 500, the NASDAQ Composite, and the Wilshire 5000. The index, which I call the Alden Keene Cause Marke

'Free' and Cause-Related Marketing: Part I

Of a sudden one of the hottest marketing concepts around is ‘free.’ But is free sustainable or even possible for organizations that are already not-for-profit? I’ll tackle that question in Thursday’s post. But first, what is ‘free’? On a recent show, Oprah told her viewers that Suze Orman’s book Women and Money could be downloaded for free from Oprah’s site for 33 hours. During that time 1.1 million copies were downloaded in English and another 19,000 in Spanish. The graphic above… from TitleZ via the blog longtail.com … shows that sales of the book on Amazon improved dramatically after the giveaway. That example comes from author Chris Anderson, who says that Free is being driven by the declining costs of digital processing, storage and bandwidth. Anderson, who is the editor of Wired magazine and the author of influential book “The Long Tail,” has another book coming out soon on the business value of giving it away for free . What other examples are there? Google, which gives away