Skip to main content

Want a Reputation as a Good Corporate Citizen? Do Some Cause Marketing

The Reputation Institute and the Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship recently released their list of the top 50 companies in the United States in terms of corporate social responsibility.

In the survey of public opinion, the top ten were:

Google

Campbell Soup

Johnson & Johnson

Walt Disney

Kraft Foods

General Mills

Levi Strauss

UPS

Berkshire Hathaway

Microsoft


I took the list and ranked the 50 according to the amount of cause marketing that I’m aware of from each company.
  • 0 meant that I had never seen any cause marketing from them.
  • 1 meant I’m aware of cause marketing promotions about once a year.
  • 2 meant I’m aware of perhaps two cause marketing promotions a year.
  • 3 meant I’m aware of perhaps monthly cause marketing promotions in a year.
  • 4 meant I’m aware of the company’s cause marketing as often as once a week
  • 5 meant I'm aware of cause marketing from the company on a daily basis.
Of the 50 companies, the only one I was unaware of was Express Scripts, a pharmacy services provider. I gave them a 0.

In my ranking a clear majority… 31 out of the 50… did at least some cause marketing. I ranked three companies as a number five; Campbell’s, General Mills, and by virtue of their IM promotion, Microsoft. No company got a four, but 12 companies got a 3, six companies got a 2 and 10 companies got a one.

Among the top 10, I ranked only two companies as a zero. I don’t recall ever seeing cause marketing from Levi Strauss or UPS. Berkshire Hathaway, a conglomerate, got a ranking of 2 based in its ownership of Dairy Queen. Most of the other nonconsumer companies like Deere, Sun Microsystems, Boeing and others got a zero.

Plainly my rankings are imperfect. It could well be that Levi Strauss, UPS and the 17 companies I gave a ranking of 0 to in fact do cause marketing that I’m just unaware of. Although I think it's more likely that I'm more aware of cause marketing than the average member of the public.

Certainly I could have inflated the amount of cause marketing I attribute to some of the companies on the list.

But for me the take-home is clear: three out of five US companies with the best corporate reputations in the public eye do some cause marketing as do eight out of the top 10. Three out of the top 10, do cause marketing continously.

If you would like a copy of my ranking or would like to rank them yourself, email me at aldenkeene @ gmail . com and I'll send you the excel spreadsheet.

Comments

Allison said…
Is it possible that people confuse Levi Strauss with Lee Jeans, or think Lee is a subsidiary of Levi Strauss & Co.? Lee sponsors the very popular National Denim Day for breast cancer research.

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor