Skip to main content

We're All Cause Marketers Now

On Monday The New York Times profiled a new cause marketing effort from a maker of healthy snacks and do-gooder Daniel Lubetzky, who owns Kind Healthy Snacks. Lubetzky has a small problem. Some of his competitors, including Snickers Bars from confection giant Mars Incorporated, are also using cause marketing to sell their own snack lines.

The Times reporter, Stuart Elliott, never puts it this directly but the logical question is inescapable. If you're a consumer-facing company with a commitment to cause marketing is it a good thing if your competitors are utilizing cause marketing, too?

All of us who have been involved in cause marketing for more than a decade or so remember that one of our primary sales points to prospects was that cause marketing helps you distinguish your product or service from competitors and gives you a new story to tell customers and the press.

Increasingly that advantage is disappearing.

(The result is a lament like the Gotterdammerung some Americans feel about China’s economic surge over the last two and a half decades. But my response is; the China of 2010 is infinitely better than the China of 1976 (the year Mao died). Certainly China and the Chinese citizenry are better off. On a net level, so too is the United States and the other western democracies.)

Bear in mind that cause marketing still has other advantages:
  • It can directly enhance sales and branding.
  • It can heighten customer loyalty.
  • It can help build employee morale and loyalty.
  • It can help improve employee profitability, skills and teamwork.
  • It can help employee recruiting and retention and build a pipeline of talent.
More cause marketing helps more nonprofits. And the money causes get from cause marketing is more valuable than the money they get from almost any other source because it comes without strings attached.

Would Daniel Lubetzky prefer that Snickers wasn’t doing its cause marketing campaign? Probably.

But the cause marketing genie’s out of the bottle, folks. And we're all cause marketers now.

Comments

Ian said…
As the founder of a cause-branded product, we are certainly concerned about this. That's why we've kept our ideas under wraps until launch.

That said, we can't be upset if big brands get into cause marketing. It's good for nonprofits and it's good for society.

Rather than try to differentiate on cause-marketing, we are looking to differentiate from big brands by:

- Being authentic, always
- Cultivating a community of consumers
- Aligning with differentiating nonprofits that are not the same ones a big brand would align with (ie, local, smaller, niche, etc)

I'd love to hear other ways cause-brands can differentiate when their corporate competitors get in the game...
@meganstrand said…
Great post!

It's true that the influx of Cause Marketing is cause for concern for those that have been doing it authentically for a decade but there are benefits to having these large corporations jump on the bandwagon.

1) First of all, pat yourself on the back for being a forward thinker. You've known all along that this is the way to go. Corporate budgets are just now understanding just how important causes are to the consumer. Go you!

2) Authenticity still rules supreme. Who's more compelling? Kind with their "pay it forward" campaign, deeply rooted in the mission of the whole company...or Snickers who has never been about serving causes and never will be? Not to say they can't put together a solid cause campaign, sure they can, but consumers are savvy and can smell an inauthentic campaign a mile away.

3) Game changing. Looking at efforts by brands such as Pepsi (and not just the ReFresh campaign) and hearing just how deeply into the corporate hierarchy this new vision started, I can't help but be impressed and encouraged that, done right, cause marketing is a permanent game-changer.

That said, I think we all agree that littering the marketplace with poorly executed, poorly conceived cause campaigns does everyone a disservice. Hopefully the market will reject those that fall under this description and continue to embrace those that are truly making an impact!
Paul Jones said…
Hi Ian & Megan:

Both of you mention authenticity and I agree.

But imagine a Venn Diagram with three circles. One of the circles is people who are engaged by your company/brand. Another is people who are engaged by the cause. The third is the customer.

Really powerful brands... think Apple, for instance... could bring their fanboys to a cause by themselves.

Likewise causes with great affinity could bring people to companies by themselves.

Elements of the customer or consumer base can be pulled in different ways, but in the broadest level they want good value.

When all three overlap to some degree that's when cause marketing is terrifically successful.

But it can still be successful when only two overlap.

Thanks for your comments, Megan and Ian.


Warm regards,

Paul
SteveG said…
I have an old business mentor that put these sorts of situations in to perfect perspective.. Don't let what your competitors do worry you.. The more you worry about them the less you are focusing on your business and customers..

Would it be great to have an exclusive on cause marketing in a niche? You bet.. Is it likely to happen?? Nope..

I certainly watch what they do, and then adopt their better ideas, but in the end, I focus on what I'm doing..

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor