Skip to main content

Park and Read Cause Marketing

Outdoor advertising companies have an expression about signs that are so busy the message can’t be taken in one glance. They call such signs, ‘park and reads.’

The usual rule of thumb for billboard is that they have no more than 8-10 words and fewer than 4 lines of text. Total.

But of course many people either don’t know or think the rule doesn’t apply to them. You see such signs all the time, although the one below probably has a subject matter you’ve never before seen on a billboard.

The ad above, from the March 31, 2011 Fortune magazine, is a park and read from the fashion designer Geoffrey Beene. The ad features Ann and Nancy Wilson of the 70s and 80s rock group Heart along with two cancer researchers, Marion Knott, MD, PhD and Raymond DuBois, MD, PhD.

There’s no arguing with the intent of this PSA campaign or the sincerity of GBGB (Geoffrey Beene Gives Back) from Geoffrey Beene, LLC. All profits from operations fund a wide array of philanthropic endeavors. GBGB is basically Newman's Own, only for fashion. Over the years, the company has generated right around $150 million in charitable donations. Geoffrey Beene, the man and designer, died of cancer in 2004.

Worthy as the effort is, the Geoffrey Beene ad is a park and read, less so because of the amount of words then because of the layout and art direction. There’s just too much going on.

I get the Rock Stars of Science thing with the rock star celebrities asserting the Rock Star qualities of the researchers and their credentials.

But bringing in the Stand Up to Cancer subhead… “This is where the end of cancer begins”… confuses more than it enlightens. Why not just put their logo at the bottom of the ad?

I suspect that Stand Up to Cancer, which can call on so many celebrities for support, provided Ann and Nancy Wilson. But let’s be honest, Heart’s best days as a rock band and as a celebrity draw are behind it.

To be fair, the Rock Stars of Science PSA has other versions with acts including Timbaland, B.o.B, Keri Hilson, and Jay Sean. But they also feature versions with Debbie Harry and Bret Michaels.

Finally, I struggle with the way they draw equivalency between the cancer researchers and the rock stars. I mean if you’re a talented cancer researcher, do you want to be compared with a rock star like Bret Michaels, the former lead singer of the band Poison, who has reached the point in his career when he's mostly famous for being famous? Are you a former punk rocker of a researcher (like Debbie Harry) who eschews the medical establishment? Or are you an up-and-coming R&B artist of a researcher (like Keri Hilson), still awaiting your first real hit?

I have nothing but love for what Geoffrey Beene has done for cancer and heart and Alzheimer’s causes, and many more worthy and deserving causes. Only the redoubtable Newman's Own has given more. But bad art direction and layout makes Rock Stars of Science a cool idea, but a 'park and read' as an ad.


Popular posts from this blog

Three Ways to Be Charitable

I’ve spent a big chunk of my career working with or for charities. Many of my dearest and ablest friends are in the charity ‘space.’ And the creativity and problem-solving coming out of the nonprofit sector has never been greater.  Although I’ve had numerous nonprofit clients over the last decade or so, I haven’t worked in a charity for about 12 years now, which gives me a certain distance. Distance lends perspective and consequently, I get a lot of people asking me which charities I recommend for donations of money or time. My usual answer is, “it depends.” “On what?” they respond. “On what you want from your charitable activities,” I reply. It sounds like a weaselly consultant kind of an answer, but bear with me for a moment. The English word charity comes from the Latin word caritas and means “from the heart,” implying a voluntary act. Caritas is the same root word for cherish. The Jews come at charity from a different direction. The Hebrew word that is usually rendered as charity is t…

Top Eight Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns of 2007

Yeah, You Read it Right. It's a Top 8 List.

More cause-related marketing campaigns are unveiled every day across the world than I review in a year at the cause-related marketing blog. And, frankly, I don’t see very many campaigns from outside North America. So I won’t pretend that my annual list of the top cause-related marketing campaigns is exhaustive.

But, like any other self-respecting blogger, I won’t let my superficial purview stop me from drawing my own tortured conclusions!

So… cue the drumroll (and the dismissive snickers)… without further ado, here is my list of the eight best cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007.

My list of the worst cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007 follows on Thursday.

Chilis and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
I was delighted by the scope of Chilis’ campaign for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. As you walked in you saw the servers adorned in black co-branded shirts. Other elements included message points on the Chilis beverage coas…

Five Steps To Nurture a 30-Year Cause Marketing Relationship

Last Monday, July 22, 2013, March of Dimes released the annual results of its campaign with Kmart... now in its thirtieth year... and thereby begged the question, what does it takes to have a multi-decade cause marketing relationship between a cause and a sponsor?

In the most recent year, Kmart,the discount retailer, donated $7.4 million to the March of Dimes, bringing the 30-year total to nearly $114 million. March of Dimes works to improve the health of mothers and babies.

Too many cause marketing relationships, in my estimation, resemble speed-dating more than long-term marriage. There can be good reasons for short-term cause marketing relationships. But most causes and sponsors benefit more from long-term marriages than short-term hookups, the main benefit being continuity. Cause marketing trades on the trust that people, usually consumers, put in the cause and the sponsor. The longer the relationship lasts the more trust is evidenced.

There's also a sponsor finding cost that…