Skip to main content

Park and Read Cause Marketing

Outdoor advertising companies have an expression about signs that are so busy the message can’t be taken in one glance. They call such signs, ‘park and reads.’

The usual rule of thumb for billboard is that they have no more than 8-10 words and fewer than 4 lines of text. Total.

But of course many people either don’t know or think the rule doesn’t apply to them. You see such signs all the time, although the one below probably has a subject matter you’ve never before seen on a billboard.

The ad above, from the March 31, 2011 Fortune magazine, is a park and read from the fashion designer Geoffrey Beene. The ad features Ann and Nancy Wilson of the 70s and 80s rock group Heart along with two cancer researchers, Marion Knott, MD, PhD and Raymond DuBois, MD, PhD.

There’s no arguing with the intent of this PSA campaign or the sincerity of GBGB (Geoffrey Beene Gives Back) from Geoffrey Beene, LLC. All profits from operations fund a wide array of philanthropic endeavors. GBGB is basically Newman's Own, only for fashion. Over the years, the company has generated right around $150 million in charitable donations. Geoffrey Beene, the man and designer, died of cancer in 2004.

Worthy as the effort is, the Geoffrey Beene ad is a park and read, less so because of the amount of words then because of the layout and art direction. There’s just too much going on.

I get the Rock Stars of Science thing with the rock star celebrities asserting the Rock Star qualities of the researchers and their credentials.

But bringing in the Stand Up to Cancer subhead… “This is where the end of cancer begins”… confuses more than it enlightens. Why not just put their logo at the bottom of the ad?

I suspect that Stand Up to Cancer, which can call on so many celebrities for support, provided Ann and Nancy Wilson. But let’s be honest, Heart’s best days as a rock band and as a celebrity draw are behind it.

To be fair, the Rock Stars of Science PSA has other versions with acts including Timbaland, B.o.B, Keri Hilson, and Jay Sean. But they also feature versions with Debbie Harry and Bret Michaels.

Finally, I struggle with the way they draw equivalency between the cancer researchers and the rock stars. I mean if you’re a talented cancer researcher, do you want to be compared with a rock star like Bret Michaels, the former lead singer of the band Poison, who has reached the point in his career when he's mostly famous for being famous? Are you a former punk rocker of a researcher (like Debbie Harry) who eschews the medical establishment? Or are you an up-and-coming R&B artist of a researcher (like Keri Hilson), still awaiting your first real hit?

I have nothing but love for what Geoffrey Beene has done for cancer and heart and Alzheimer’s causes, and many more worthy and deserving causes. Only the redoubtable Newman's Own has given more. But bad art direction and layout makes Rock Stars of Science a cool idea, but a 'park and read' as an ad.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor