Skip to main content

Cause Marketing to the Fashionable Man

The year is 1885 and the organization building the pedestal for the Statue of Liberty runs out of money. Joseph Pulitzer, publisher of the New York newspaper The World, runs an editorial saying that he would print the name of everyone who donated even one penny to the fund. Sure enough pennies, nickels, dimes and quarters start rolling in, along with larger donations. Construction resumes and by April 1886, the pedestal is finished and ready for Lady Liberty.

It’s an old ploy, but the men’s magazine Gentlemen’s Quarterly is using it to raise money for The Gentlemen’s Fund, which in turn raises money for four nonprofit charities; Oceana, represented in this ad by actor Adrian Grenier, Feeding America, DonorsChoose.org, the classroom teacher-funding charity, and Natural Resources Defense Council.

When you donate $100 you can be recognized in GQ’s December 2011 Men of the Year issue. Donation amounts of $200 or more receive a few extra benefits in addition to mention in the magazine.

Called Gentlemen Give Back, the editorial mention is just one of three ways The Gentlemen’s Fund raises money for its benefiting charities. The site takes direct donations for the four charities, they sponsor a benefit called The Gentlemen’s Ball in New York City in October, and they sell merchandise. The charities may also get a take of the sponsorship money.

And, oh, what a list of sponsors! The Gentlemen’s Fund sponsors are veritable who’s who of men’s fashion houses and goodies that end in vowels; Giorgio Armani, Valentino, Porsche, Prada, Gucci, Versace, along with IWC watches, Barneys, Land Rover, Hugo Boss, and a bunch of other chi-chi brands conspicuously absent from my closet and garage.

The celebrity support is solid, too. We already know about Adrian Grenier. Actor David Arquette supports Feeding America, TV host Jimmy Fallon the Natural Resources Defense Council, and actor Ashton Kutcher stands up for Donorschoose.org and his own charitable foundation called DNA, which fights child sex slavery.

Gentlemen’s Quarterly
is published by Cónde Nast, which is also the publisher of Vogue, where the Grenier ad came from.

I like the idea of targeting men with this stylish celebrity-driven cause marketing that is so familiar to female audiences. I certainly think Cónde Nast is giving the campaign respectable support; I’ve seen Gentlemen’s Fund ads in sister magazines including Wired, Vanity Fair, and Golf Digest.

But I wonder how well it’s actually doing.

The website says the 2010 The Gentlemen’s Ball in 2010, which featured live appearances by Fallon, Kutcher, and Arquette, and a video from Grenier, attracted 300 guests and “raised $400,000.” I don’t know if that’s net or gross, although I do know how expensive it is to throw a charity ball in New York City.

But I can all but guarantee that any of the better charity balls held during New York’s Fashion Week earlier this year did better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor