Skip to main content

Space Available Cause Marketing on Packaging

This bottom panel of this box of house brand facial tissue box from Walmart features what amounts to space available cause marketing on package, something many other sponsors could also do.

Magazines and newspapers have long offered space-available ads to nonprofits. If they have your ad in the right form that fits a hole they have in their publication... and if your ad is compelling... they might run your ad for free. But I’ve never noticed anything like that for packaging.

That’s not for lack of proximity. This box has been rattling around my car for some time. The copyright says 2005, although I doubt this box is that old. But since Walmart changed its logo in 2008, and got away from the dash between Wal and mart, the box is no newer than that.

The effort benefits Walmart’s effort in conjunction with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Youth called The Missing Children’s Network. At the front of every Walmart store and Sam’s Club in the United States is a board with pictures of missing children.

Since 1996, when the effort was started, more than 10,400 children have been featured on the board and more than 8700 have been located. Walmart says 205 of those children were found as a direct result of its network of boards.

Other sponsors… especially retailers with house brands… could offer the same thing to their charity partners. Facial tissue boxes represent a lot of real estate. This one’s 8.75 inches x 4.75 inches by 3.75 inches tall. You couldn’t as easily do space available ads on a soup can or other food item which has a lot of labeling requirements facial tissue doesn’t.

For that matter, Walmart could certainly take the co-branding a little further. They could put the faces of the kids from The Missing Children’s Network board on the box's bottom panel. In the United States, cartons of milk have featured such images for years. And, if my experience is common, in most cases a box of facial tissues has a longer life than does a carton of milk.

The box itself was decorated in a kind of red, black and yellow tartan pattern. But it could just as easily be some version of The Missing Children’s Network logo or its colors.

Walmart could work with existing charity partners or it could hold a promotion and take nominations of other worthy charities to feature on package. Considering Walmart’s volume, I’d bet that six months of messaging on the back of boxes of facial tissue would be seen by more people than an ad that ran for six months in Time Magazine (in a space that’s about 3/4 of a full page ad in Time).

For that matter plenty of name-brand manufacturers could do the same thing that Walmart’s done here, especially for non-food items. Xerox could do it with a ream of copy paper. Reynolds Wrap could do it on its boxes of aluminum foil. Procter and Gamble could do it with Tide, etc.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor