Skip to main content

'Checkout' This New Cause Marketing Study

In its most recent edition, The Checkout, the publishing outlet for research developed by The Integer Group, asked Americans an intriguing cause marketing question: “When choosing between two companies that each benefit a cause and sell the same product, similar in price and quality, which of the following would influence your preference for one brand over another.”

Let’s put some flesh on that. The question asks, in effect, when do you buy Progresso soup and when do buy Campbell’s soup, given that they both benefit education causes? Or when do you buy Yoplait yogurt and when do you buy Dannon yogurt, each of which generates funds for separate breast cancer charities?

No surprise, but ‘Personal Relevance of Cause’ was the top answer for both men and women, polling out around 70 percent (the graph was formatted such that exact percentages are hard to determine). The most surprising answer for me was the second most common answer. About 33 percent of men said that “Donates With Every Purchase” compared to about 38 percent of the overall population and about 44 percent of women who gave that answer.

Men seem to care less about transactional cause marketing than women.

On its website The Integer Group describes itself as “a global discussion about the impact of shopping culture on brand strategy.” The research based on a nationally representative study of 1,200 adults and is conducted by M/A/R/C Research.

The Checkout published the results of three cause marketing questions. The other two were:

“Which of the following types of causes do you find most compelling if you were to buy a brand based on its affiliation with a cause?”

“Which brands of products do you currently buy based on the brand’s affiliation with a cause?”

The top 10 finishers were:
  1. Yoplait
  2. Anything Affiliated With Breast Cancer
  3. (tie) Susan G. Komen for the Cure and Newman’s Own
  4. General Mills
  5. Yogurt in general
  6. (tie) P&G and RED
  7. Boxtops for Education
  8. (tie) Kellogg’s, Campbell’s and Girl Scouts
  9. Dawn
  10. Avon
The big winner in that list is General Mills, which is listed three times. General Mills owns the Yoplait brand and is responsible for Boxtops for Education. Dawn’s place on the list was unexpected. The survey was conducted in February, 2011, and it could be that Dawn’s work in the aftermath of the BP oil spill in April, May, June and July of 2010 was still fresh in people’s minds.

The other winner has to be (RED), which has only been around since 2006. No other brand on the list has been doing cause marketing for less than 10 years. Campbell’s Labels for Education has been going on for more than 35 years.

The biggest shocker has to be that ‘yogurt in general’ finished fifth, evidence that the Yoplait halo is big enough for the whole yogurt category. No wonder Dannon mimics Yoplait so closely.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Part 2: How Chili's Used Cause-Related Marketing to Raise $8.2 million for St. Jude

[Bloggers Note: In this second half of this post I discuss the nuts and bolts of how Chili's motivates support from its employees and managers and how St. Jude 'activates' support from Chili's. Read the first half here.] How does St. Jude motivate support from Chili’s front line employees and management alike? They call it ‘activation’ and they do so by the following: They share stories of St. Jude patients who were sick and got better thanks to the services they received at the hospital. Two stories in particular are personal for Chili’s staff. A Chili’s bartender in El Dorado Hills, California named Jeff Eagles has a younger brother who was treated at St. Jude. In both 2005 and 2006 Eagles was the campaign’s biggest individual fundraiser. John Griffin, a manager at the Chili’s in Conway, Arkansas had an infant daughter who was treated for retinoblastoma at St. Jude. They drew on the support Doug Brooks… the president and CEO of Brinker International, Chili’s parent co...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chili’s and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

I was in Chili’s today and I ordered their “Triple-Dipper,” a three appetizer combo. While I waited for the food, I noticed another kind of combo. Chili’s is doing a full-featured cause-related marketing campaign for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. There was a four-sided laminated table tent outlining the campaign on the table. When the waitress brought the drinks she slapped down Chili’s trademark square paper beverage coasters and on them was a call to action for an element of the campaign called ‘Create-A-Pepper,’ a kind of paper icon campaign. The wait staff was all attired in black shirts co-branded with Chili’s and St. Jude. The Create-A-Pepper paper icon could be found in a stack behind the hostess area. The Peppers are outlines of Chili’s iconic logo meant to be colored. I paid $1 for mine, but they would have taken $5, $10, or more. The crayons, too, were co-branded with the ‘Create-A-Pepper’ and St. Jude’s logos. There’s also creatapepper.com, a microsite, but again wi...
11 comments
Read more

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor...
1 comment
Read more