Skip to main content

Book Review of "Cause Marketing for Dummies" by Waters and MacDonald

In the December 1991 issue of Life magazine insurer Fireman’s Fund ran the image ad at the left that describes the insurer’s role in the restoration of Ellis Island. Read the body copy and conspicuous by its absence is any mention of Fireman’s Fund actually supporting the restoration financially.

That was 20 years ago… just eight years after American Express’s seminal cause marketing effort on behalf of the restoration of the neighboring Statue of Liberty… and a lot has changed. Life magazine still ran ads for cigarettes, for instance. Moreover, I submit to you that if Ellis Island were being restored in 2011 Fireman’s Fund would almost certainly make a financial donation to the effort that would be mentioned in the ad.

Joe Waters and Joanna MacDonald both started their careers in cause marketing in the early 1990s, (as did I). And in the process they and other pioneers of cause marketing have changed the way companies think about and communicate the ways that they benefit society, and that’s all for the good in my book.

Now these two veterans have penned their own book called Cause Marketing for Dummies that is a welcome addition to the cause marketing literature.

I’ll bet I’ve read 90% of the books written about cause marketing. The earliest ones were often stuffy or unreadable. A few were both. The first authors on the topic of cause marketing often tried too hard to persuade that the practice was both effective and acceptable to reasonable people.

By contrast, Cause Marketing for Dummies approaches the topic with the assumption that the case for cause marketing has mainly been made. That assumption allows Joe and Joanna to get refreshingly tactical in their book. Cause Marketing for Dummies is especially strong on the topics of paper icon campaigns (they refer to them as ‘pinups’) and on transactional cause marketing efforts.

Joe is also a social media geek of some standing and the book also shines on the burgeoning practice of location-based cause marketing and how cause marketers can use the breadth and depth of social media. Likewise the book benefits from Joe’s wonderful sense of humor. (Full disclosure: Joe and I are friends and he mentions www.causemarketing.biz as a resource in the book.)

Joe and Joanna should also be praised for their emphasis on the importance of selling in cause marketing. “Nothing happens until something gets sold,” the old saying goes, and Joe and Joanna tackle that topic head-on and apology-free with good suggestions and solid advice.

Cause Marketing for Dummies is not the perfect cause marketing book. It doesn’t substantively address the vital topic of cause marketing campaign activation, for instance.

But Cause Marketing for Dummies is eminently readable and chock-full of good counsel. My copy has a number of highlighted sections.

I heartily recommend Cause Marketing for Dummies to any of my readers. Especially anyone who doesn’t have the benefit of Joe and Joanna’s more than 35 years of collective experience in on-the-ground cause marketing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor