Skip to main content

What Comes After ‘Pink Pledges’ in Cause Marketing?

More pink ribbon cause marketing, this time from retailer Dress Barn.

For every 'Lilac' plush toy animal sold for $6 through Dec. 31, 2011, Dress Barn will send “the entire net profit of at least $2.50 to support local and national breast cancer initiatives” at the American Cancer Society.”

Lilac was featured on the inside front cover flap of the “Late Fall 2011” Dress Barn catalog.

I much admire the clear language in this appeal. The American Cancer Society will receive the entire profit from the sale each plush toy and naming a specific dollar figure. Would that more sponsors were as transparent.

The bottom portion of the flap encourages people to ‘Take the Pink Pledge.’ Point your smart phone at the QR code or go to yourdressbarn.com/mypinkpledge and you can post online your cancer story or Take the Pink Pledge. As of this writing they had 3,413 pledges.

Variations of Dress Barn’s ‘Pink Pledge’ have been around forever. Dress Barn’s asks you for your name and email address and prompts you with “I pledge to take care of myself by…” Then, for who knows what reason, limits your response to 500 characters.

As of that last paragraph, I had spilled approximately 918 characters, right around a half-page of text. Perhaps Dress Barn’s IT people are worried that people would be so verbose that the company might have to spend an extra $50 a month for another terabyte of server-space.

But never mind all that.

I think it’s time that we found a call to action that is a little substantive than those like the Pink Pledge. Ultimately, pledges are about changing behavior, getting that dreaded mammogram, for instance, dropping a few pounds, starting an exercise program, doing self-exams more regularly, etc. A pledge is a promise to do…or not do… something. But that’s all it is.

And while I believe that the behavioral psychology literature shows that writing something down dramatically improves your chances of actually undertaking it, because of the ephemeral nature of such pledges on a website that you’ll only visit once, I doubt it holds true in this instance.

Imagine instead that in addition to selling Lilac that Dress Barn offered a donation of money and/or volunteer hours to the Cancer Society based on actual behavioral changes. Lowered your fat intake 10%. Tell us about it and Dress Barn will donate $3 to the Cancer Society. Got that mammogram? Excellent! Tell us more and Dress Barn employees will donate an hour to the Cancer Society.

The telling part would create a sense of social proof, that phenomena of persuasion whereby people assume that if other people have done something it must be OK for you to do it too.

How would Dress Barn know what people might respond to? Well, as it’s currently constituted, the Pink Pledge will generate thousands of responses. Dress Barn could simply parse those results to get a sense of the kinds of behavior people think they need to change.

The result would really move the needle on breast cancer awareness and prevention, instead of merely pledging to do so.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor