Skip to main content

Add the Word 'No' To Your Cause Marketing Toolkit

Every business day in this blog I chronicle the best and worst of cause marketing. As you seek inspiration for where to take your own cause marketing you must eschew the bad. But you must also learn how to refuse the good.

I was reminded of this by an anecdote about Steve Jobs in a book I’ve been reading called ‘The Idea Hunter,’ by Andy Boynton and Bill Fischer. They tell about how Jobs was speaking to a group of executives at Yahoo when the subject of saying no to bad ideas came up.

“That’s easy,” said Jobs. “The challenge is in saying no to good ideas.”

Jobs came back to this theme more than once and in one instance was quoted thusly:
“People think focus means saying yes to the thing you’ve got to focus on. But that’s not what it means at all. It means saying no to the hundred other good ideas that there are. You have to pick carefully.”
Anyone with a modicum of judgment knows the stinkers. But it’s the good ideas that require real expertise to deal with. That’s because if you let them the good ideas take resources away from the great ideas.

In fact, I heard this exact point made by my former boss and the founder of Children’s Miracle Network, Mick Shannon, a good 10 years before the Jobs quote.

Many charities reach a point where people start coming to them with ideas of every stripe. It’s a matter of scale; St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital gets called on more often than the local food bank. But even the food bank almost certainly hears from dozens of people a year who have an idea for them.

Mick Shannon is a difficult guy to characterize. He and Joe Lake founded Children’s Miracle Network with not much more than moxie and Shinola. He was renowned for his screaming matches with employees (and others) and he has a crazy lateral lisp. He would fly a redeye cross-country, but stand for the whole flight, chatting up the flight attendants. He was a tough guy with a volatile temper, although he was always good to me. But put him in a children’s hospital with sick kids and he’d melt like a all-day sucker left out in the Florida rain.

Mick ran Children’s Miracle Network for more than 20 years. Once he left his contradictions became even more pronounced.

But Mick was more right about saying no to good ideas than even Jobs was.

Here’s why; a cause has less leeway, less rope, less patience from its stakeholders for mistakes and miscues. The recent Komen debacle is good example of just how little leeway nonprofit leaders really have, notwithstanding the good they do.

Jobs was wrong about John Sculley, NeXT, the Newton, telling people to hold the iPhone in a certain way so that calls wouldn’t drop, sticking with AT&T for too long, staying estranged from his oldest daughter for so much of her youth, not owing up to the working conditions of workers in Apple factories, and many more.

And, yet, we nonetheless hail him as one of the greatest CEOs of all time.

But the CEO of a cause doesn’t often get that many chances at failure. In such an environment, saying no to the merely good is therefore doubly prudent.

So keep ‘no’ in mind as you put together the elements of your next cause marketing effort.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor