Skip to main content

How an Agency Should Evaluate Its Cause Marketing Creative

How should an agency evaluate a cause marketing campaign it had a hand in creating?

Agencies have their own unique gloss on evaluating the success of a campaign.
  • Agencies care about achieving higher creative standards.
  • Agencies frequently care about things like whether a campaign helps them add another trophy to the case or brings the respect of peers and the trade press.
  • And it goes without saying that agencies care about whether the work they do for the campaign meets internal benchmarks for profitability.
But in my view what should matter most for agencies is the degree to which the creative they produced is aligned with the nonprofit’s goals and objectives. Agencies must evaluate the success of a cause marketing campaign based on whether it achieved the nonprofit’s… and the sponsor’s… definitions of success.

Sometimes this means setting aside biases (both personal and institutional).

In cause marketing campaigns, the job of the agency isn’t to be clever for the sake of being clever. The agency's job is to help create a campaign that works; that is, a campaign that sells.

Last year Dan Pallotta, himself now an agency man after founding and running several anti-AIDS causes, made an interesting point in the Harvard Business Review blogs. Businesses sometimes scorn nonprofits as being inherently not self-sustainable, he writes.

But, “if reliance on the wealth of others makes a business not self-sustaining, then no business is self-sustaining. The music industry, for example, is not self-sustaining, because it relies on the wealth of consumers, who use their money to buy albums,” says Pallotta.

What can help make nonprofits self-sustainable? Here's how Pallotta answers:
“Most people want to help others. Their lives would feel incomplete without this connection to humanity. We can tap into this human desire by marketing compassion with the same rigor as we market luxury cars.”
That’s the ultimate assessment for an agency. Did they bring value that made the campaign more effective? Or did they bring creative that won cheers from their peers and yawns from the nonprofit's stakeholders? 

Comments

Michelle Suchecki said…
I find this topic interesting as businesses are highly critical of non profits but this article shows that they both need cash flow from either consumers/sponsors in order to be successful. An agency definitely needs to be creative when marketing in order to stand out from competitors and make sure that their strategy is in line with their objectives while doing so. I believe that even marketing strategies need to think of creating a "blue ocean" rather then joining the bloody waters of the "red ocean" (companies going throat to throat). Creating a blue ocean when marketing will in turn set companies apart and can potentially make a company very successful. Red Ocean: Barnum and Bailey (traditional circus with animals) Blue Ocean: Cirque Du Soleil (upscale circus displaying much physicality and staging effects).
Michelle Suchecki said…
I find this topic interesting as businesses are highly critical of non profits but this article shows that they both need cash flow from either consumers/sponsors in order to be successful. An agency definitely needs to be creative when marketing in order to stand out from competitors and make sure that their strategy is in line with their objectives while doing so. I believe that even marketing strategies need to think of creating a "blue ocean" rather then joining the bloody waters of the "red ocean" (companies going throat to throat). Creating a blue ocean when marketing will in turn set companies apart and can potentially make a company very successful. Red Ocean: Barnum and Bailey (traditional circus with animals) Blue Ocean: Cirque Du Soleil (upscale circus displaying much physicality and staging effects).
Sarah Tiner said…
The information you are giving is really helpful to people.But can you more information about your services.Push Marketing
Unknown said…
This topic is very similar to the topic my class in the university is covering "Corporate Cause promotion". I totally agree with the point about businesses criticizing non-profits yet they do not mention the detail that without such businesses and non-profit donations, those businesses would lack a lot of good cause promotion. Not all cause promotions focus simply on money but also how unique and involved a company can be during a 'needed cause event'. When speaking about marketing strategies, companies need to think outside the box and not be just like all the competitors. That difference creates cause promotional success.

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor