Skip to main content

Good Cause Marketing Lessons From Bad PR

Causemarketing.biz, this humble little site you’re reading right now, is the Interweb’s largest, most diverse and comprehensive blog on cause marketing.

Maybe the site's size and renown explains the volume of off-topic pitches I get from well-meaning PR people.

There’s a name for these people. When they send me helpful pitches that are pertinent to causemarketing.biz I call them PR angels. When they pitch me ideas that are off-topic, too long, too dumb, or addressed to “Dear Alden,” I just call them clueless.

Editors and reporters have started to out the clueless. Heck, even PR people are outing the clueless. It's never been more chic than right now to complain about PR idiots.

I’m not going to out any clueless PR people by name. Not today anyway. But to prove my point, here is a short list of subject lines that have appeared in my in-box in the last week:
  • “Text Messaging: a Marketers Paradise for Increasing Brand Engagement.”
  • “Sales and Marketing Team: The Real Drivers Behind iPad Implementation.”
  • What comes after Kony 2012?
And a personal favorite from a few years back:
  • “BOARDFEST SNOWBOARD RAIL JAM GOES COED FOR BLIZZARD AT THE BEACH.”  And yes, it shouted at me just like that in all-caps.
There are lessons in all this for all cause marketers, but especially for those from the nonprofit world.
  1. Don’t Just ‘Doorbell-Ditch’ Your Cause Marketing Proposals. When I was an adolescent I was known to have doorbell-ditched from time to time. You know, where you ring the doorbell on a home and then run? The lesson is, don’t just email your proposal to someone you’ve had no contact with. Don’t spam prospects with your proposal. They have to be addressed to someone. And that person must agree to receive it before you send it off.
  2. Consider Scale and Appropriateness. If your cause is a model railway museum in Fiddler’s Bend, Oklahoma you’re almost certainly barking up the wrong tree to propose a CRM campaign to American Express. That’s not to say that all successful cause marketing relationships are purely strategic. But very few of them are openly stupid.
  3. Style Counts. In terms of the format of your proposal no type should be smaller than about 20 points. Don’t use Comic Sans or other wacky fonts or weirdly-colored type. And the deck can’t be more than 20 pages max unless you’re author/consultant Tom Peters. In which case you’re allowed 22 pages. If it’s on paper or Powerpoint; use the landscape format. Use pictures, and plenty of them. But make sure they’re dynamite and that they illustrate your cause and the campaign as well as possible. 
  4. If the Answer is No Measure Carefully Any Response. Think very hard before you fire back something venomous if all you get in response is a form letter. Maybe only a juggernaut like St. Jude Children’s Research Medical Center could get away with such a response. For everyone else, remember that cause marketing is a marathon, not a 100-meter dash. What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. You attract more with flies with honey than vinegar. (Insert the morale-building cliché of your choice here.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor