Skip to main content

Let's Clear Out This Cause Marketing Logjam

Suppose you’re a small entrepreneur with a generous impulse and you want to offer sponsorship dollars to one or more charities, especially prominent ones. How would that phone call or email go?

Karma52, an cause-based apparel company, is finding it tough going.

That’s because the biggest causes ask for (and get) large upfront commitments from would-be sponsors. They require such commitments as a kind of qualifier. If you can’t afford a cause's upfront, for instance, then it can assume that you’re not a likely partner. Moreover, causes are rightly concerned that they risk their brand by getting involved with a sponsor that is either a bad match, a dishonest operator, or worse.

But in their caution, causes are leaving money on the table. The Fortune 1000 has largely been picked through by causes. Most of the large companies are either already doing cause marketing or it doesn’t make sense for them. The future growth of cause marketing for causes will be with smaller companies. 

Karma52’s business model is like Threadless.com. Launching in the second quarter of 2013, Karma52 will create original artwork representative of a cause, one per week. Karma52 will put the design on T-shirts and other apparel and merchandise, and then give a portion of sales to the cause.

“Thus,” says Karma52’s promotional materials, “good karma goes back to a country that has been good to them, and they reap good karma manifold for giving. The opportunity for good karma occurs 52 weeks every year, and 52 worthy national causes are helped. By wearing Karma52 apparel, customers wear their good karma!”

Karma52 asks potential partners for no cash, only the ability to use the cause’s logo and feature the designs in an online gallery. Karma52 certainly also hopes that the cause will activate the sponsorship via PR and online.  But, so far, American causes haven’t responded well.

Instead, says Karma52, “most organizations are requiring a specific dollar amount to be pledged, or one year in business, or need to discuss with their board and then never get back to us…  Ironically, if we donate to non-USA causes, they are quick and thankful to agree. However, our preference is to give back to our country and its inhabitants by supporting American causes.”

In effect, we have a kind of Catch-22 in place for Karma52 and other such social enterprises. They can’t afford the upfront donations or commitments, and their business model requires that they have relationships with multiple causes.

Over the years I’ve heard a number of such stories from entrepreneurs and other enterprising companies.

I think there’s room for some sort of mechanism… or an intermediary… whereby small companies could engage with charities, big and small, without putting the cause at risk or requiring unlikely commitments from putative sponsors. There's an answer to this dilemma, but to my knowledge it just hasn't been developed yet.

Until then, the logjam can only be cleared if someone extends a little trust.

If your cause would like to partner with Karma52, contact help@karma52.org, hila@karma52.org, or keith@karma52.org. The phone number is: 657-212-5423.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chili’s and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

I was in Chili’s today and I ordered their “Triple-Dipper,” a three appetizer combo. While I waited for the food, I noticed another kind of combo. Chili’s is doing a full-featured cause-related marketing campaign for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. There was a four-sided laminated table tent outlining the campaign on the table. When the waitress brought the drinks she slapped down Chili’s trademark square paper beverage coasters and on them was a call to action for an element of the campaign called ‘Create-A-Pepper,’ a kind of paper icon campaign. The wait staff was all attired in black shirts co-branded with Chili’s and St. Jude. The Create-A-Pepper paper icon could be found in a stack behind the hostess area. The Peppers are outlines of Chili’s iconic logo meant to be colored. I paid $1 for mine, but they would have taken $5, $10, or more. The crayons, too, were co-branded with the ‘Create-A-Pepper’ and St. Jude’s logos. There’s also creatapepper.com, a microsite, but again wi...

Part 2: How Chili's Used Cause-Related Marketing to Raise $8.2 million for St. Jude

[Bloggers Note: In this second half of this post I discuss the nuts and bolts of how Chili's motivates support from its employees and managers and how St. Jude 'activates' support from Chili's. Read the first half here.] How does St. Jude motivate support from Chili’s front line employees and management alike? They call it ‘activation’ and they do so by the following: They share stories of St. Jude patients who were sick and got better thanks to the services they received at the hospital. Two stories in particular are personal for Chili’s staff. A Chili’s bartender in El Dorado Hills, California named Jeff Eagles has a younger brother who was treated at St. Jude. In both 2005 and 2006 Eagles was the campaign’s biggest individual fundraiser. John Griffin, a manager at the Chili’s in Conway, Arkansas had an infant daughter who was treated for retinoblastoma at St. Jude. They drew on the support Doug Brooks… the president and CEO of Brinker International, Chili’s parent co...

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor...