Skip to main content

An Early Favorite For the Worst Cause Marketing of 2012

In the wake of Hurricane Sandy, hundreds on what I call Instant-On cause marketing efforts have sprung up. But none are as weaselly as one from a New Jersey outfit called Active Energy Boost.

Active Energy Boost is a line of energy drinks sold from self-liquidating point of sale displays. Active Energy is offering 100 free distributorships… or, as the press release puts it: “donating 100 businesses to victims, police and firemen, EMT responders, medical personnel, or any one who was either a victim or provided a service during Hurricane Sandy.”

I wonder if that also includes people who watched Hurricane Sandy news coverage on TV.

“We have decided that the best and quickest way to help 100 victims is to donate a lucrative business to them that they in turn, can derive immediate income to help rebuild,” says John Jacobs, head of PR. It’s a valuable offer because “each route and distributor cost us over $1,500 to start,” says Jim Contreni, Active Energy's distributor trainer.

Uh-huh.

Normally there’s a fee associated with being an Active Energy distributor. Although I didn’t feel like going through the registration process to find out what it is. They also offer route exclusivity for, I suppose, a premium over the regular rate.

In addition to the distribution fee, you have to buy the product up-front and maybe the cost of the POS materials as well. There’s a recommended purchase price. The store gets its part and you get the rest. Naturally, you also have to beat the bushes to find the retailers willing to display and sell the product. Take this offer and all the risk, with the exception of that first upfront fee, is on you.

The concept of distributorships was developed as a way to equitably split risk, and it’s a perfectly legitimate way of doing business. It’s how cars are sold and the way that bottles of beer and cans of Coke get to your supermarket. Snap-On dealers are tool distributors with their own trucks. Schwan’s distributors are much the same for dairy and other products. By contrast, little about Active Energy feels genuine, or, for that matter, long-term.

The Coca-Cola bottler in your town paid a hefty amount to build the bottling plant, outfit the trucks, lease the vending machines. But the payoff was that they get to sell a 115-year-old brand that is supported by hundreds of millions of dollars a year in advertising. In my little market, the Coca-Cola bottler serves up perhaps a million servings a day. That’s why a company can get a loan to help pay for a Coca-Cola bottling operation. 

This cause marketing offer from Active Energy Boost is almost certain to land on my list as the ‘10 Worst Cause Marketing Campaigns of 2012 ‘

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor