Skip to main content

Out-Competed in Cause Marketing? Then Step Up Your Game!

Yesterday I was a judge in the preliminary rounds of my state’s DECA convention/competition. If you’ve never done it, do yourself a favor and volunteer. It will renew your faith in the youth of America.

Each student-pair got a prepared case study and 20 minutes to work up a campaign… the case study given to the students I judged was about marketing a new dental practice in a medium-sized community… then 10 minutes to present it in front of the judges. For our part, we were to ask three prepared questions. One of those questions was words to the effect, ‘won’t this promotion you planned disturb the other dental practices in the community?’

Perhaps half the teams felt bad that this was the case and proposed potential ways to remedy it. But one team in particular was unapologetic.

They said something like this: “If our promotion shakes customers away from the existing dental practices, it’s probably because they weren’t being well served. If the established practices don’t step up their game, they may go out of business. If they do step up their game then the result will be a higher standard of dental care for everyone in the community.”

I could have hugged the kid, especially after seeing an article on Tuesday in the Wall Street Journal about the growing tensions between the Movember Foundation and the American Mustache Institute (AMI), both of which are charities that do good work. Writes Shelly Banjo of the Journal:
“But now Mr. Perlut (a founder of AMI) and his allies are chafing at Movember's rapid growth. They accuse the nonprofit of taking the humor out of facial-hair fundraising and of failing to support other fuzz-friendly charity groups.

“’The unfortunate byproduct of getting too big is people take themselves too seriously and lose their authenticity,’ says Alex Aizenberg, who goes by the nickname ‘El Beardo’ and is the co-founder of Build-A-Beard, a website that chronicles the unshaven and sponsors charity balls.”
Last year Movember raised $132 million globally, the AMI a fraction of that. You don’t have to read the whole story to see that the AMI has been out-competed.

The same happens in cause marketing. The ‘best’ charity doesn’t always win the fattest cause marketing sponsorships. It may not be fair, but it’s real life. The race is not always to the swift. By itself, the better mousetrap doesn’t always cause a stampede to your door. The VHS video cassette system didn't beat out the Betamax because it was the superior product.

If the AMI just wants to chafe at the indignities served up by Movember’s aggressiveness, then they should lick their wounds and go home.

But the world of mustachioed charitable work would be better served if, as the high school student said yesterday, the AMI "stepped up their game.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor