Skip to main content

The Paradox of Pink Ribbon Cause Marketing

On a Wednesday a few Octobers back I had a pink ribbon day to beat all. For breakfast I had a carton of pink-topped Yoplait Strawberry-Mango yogurt. That carton top, along with the others we’d collected, garnered $0.10 apiece for Susan G. Komen for the Cure.

At mid-morning I stopped at my grocer’s deli and picked up a little smoked turkey. The lady at the counter was wearing a pink hat with Komen’s version of the pink ribbon, but like all the versions of the pink ribbon, emblematic of the fight against breast cancer. There was a counter card saying that Boar’s Head deli product supported Komen.

Later I was looking for one of those clear film protectors for my mobile device and I came across a local firm that sells just the thing. Oh, and they donated 5% of online sales in October to the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

Without much effort we could list dozens of pink ribbon cause marketing efforts that take place each fall. But here's the conundrum, in the United States with a couple of notable exceptions no one really 'owns' the pink ribbon.

Consequently, there’s no licensing issues for a would-be sponsor. No extra cost for splashing a pink ribbon on your marketing collateral. You can find a thousand different versions of the pink ribbon online, or you can design your own. That is, while there are couple of trademarked versions of the pink ribbon, the fact is that anyone and everyone can use and, let's just say it, abuse the generic version of the pink ribbon. It's the classic challenge of property that belongs to the 'commons.'

In the past I’ve termed the widespread availability of the pink ribbon ‘Open-Source Cause Marketing’ and it has its downside. Plenty of companies say they're raising money for the fight against breast cancer but no money ever arrives at any charity.

In Canada, the pink ribbon is trademarked and you have to license it in order to use it in promotions. Wouldn't that work in the United States?

At this point the pink ribbon probably couldn’t be trademarked in the United States except by government fiat. It's just been too widely used for too long. 

But the broader point is this; if Komen, or the BCRF, or the National Breast Cancer Foundation, or the American Cancer Society, or Self Magazine, or the handful of other parties involved had locked up the pink ribbon with an early trademark registration not only would there be less abuse it would also, paradoxically, be much less ubiquitous today than it is.

Canada's registration requirement works, in part, because the rest of North America does not have the same compulsion. Canada is a 'free-ridder' on the popularity of the pink ribbon across the rest of the continent.

And then there's this; because anyone can use (and abuse) the pink ribbon, innovation can happen much faster. By contrast, registration rules reliably stifle permutation.

It's a paradox. Because the pink ribbon isn't trademarked, it's much bigger than it would be if it was. And, because it's not protected, many people and companies use the ribbon disingenuously and even fraudulently.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Three Ways to Be Charitable

I’ve spent a big chunk of my career working with or for charities. Many of my dearest and ablest friends are in the charity ‘space.’ And the creativity and problem-solving coming out of the nonprofit sector has never been greater.  Although I’ve had numerous nonprofit clients over the last decade or so, I haven’t worked in a charity for about 12 years now, which gives me a certain distance. Distance lends perspective and consequently, I get a lot of people asking me which charities I recommend for donations of money or time. My usual answer is, “it depends.” “On what?” they respond. “On what you want from your charitable activities,” I reply. It sounds like a weaselly consultant kind of an answer, but bear with me for a moment. The English word charity comes from the Latin word caritas and means “from the heart,” implying a voluntary act. Caritas is the same root word for cherish. The Jews come at charity from a different direction. The Hebrew word that is usually rendered as charity is t…

Top Eight Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns of 2007

Yeah, You Read it Right. It's a Top 8 List.

More cause-related marketing campaigns are unveiled every day across the world than I review in a year at the cause-related marketing blog. And, frankly, I don’t see very many campaigns from outside North America. So I won’t pretend that my annual list of the top cause-related marketing campaigns is exhaustive.

But, like any other self-respecting blogger, I won’t let my superficial purview stop me from drawing my own tortured conclusions!

So… cue the drumroll (and the dismissive snickers)… without further ado, here is my list of the eight best cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007.

My list of the worst cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007 follows on Thursday.


Chilis and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
I was delighted by the scope of Chilis’ campaign for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. As you walked in you saw the servers adorned in black co-branded shirts. Other elements included message points on the Chilis beverage coas…

Five Steps To Nurture a 30-Year Cause Marketing Relationship

Last Monday, July 22, 2013, March of Dimes released the annual results of its campaign with Kmart... now in its thirtieth year... and thereby begged the question, what does it takes to have a multi-decade cause marketing relationship between a cause and a sponsor?

In the most recent year, Kmart,the discount retailer, donated $7.4 million to the March of Dimes, bringing the 30-year total to nearly $114 million. March of Dimes works to improve the health of mothers and babies.

Too many cause marketing relationships, in my estimation, resemble speed-dating more than long-term marriage. There can be good reasons for short-term cause marketing relationships. But most causes and sponsors benefit more from long-term marriages than short-term hookups, the main benefit being continuity. Cause marketing trades on the trust that people, usually consumers, put in the cause and the sponsor. The longer the relationship lasts the more trust is evidenced.

There's also a sponsor finding cost that…