Skip to main content

Another Benefit to Cause Marketing: Better Supplier Pricing

Two professors at the Ohio State University have a new take on the benefits of cause marketing; it helps keep supplier pricing in check.

Their paper, called “A Supply-Side Explanation for the Use of Cause Marketing” by Anil Arya and Brian Mittendorf, starts with the proposition that,
“firm profits under simple(non-strategic) corporate philanthropy wherein the firm pledges a donation amount to charity. The paper then demonstrates that the firm can achieve the same donation level while also cutting supplier costs by tying donations to sales. Such a cause marketing tie-in intrinsically undermines the per-unit profitability of each product by adding a new marginal cost of sales. As such, the cause marketing pledge makes the firm's input demand much more sensitive to supplier pricing. This increased sensitivity to pricing persuades the supplier to charge a lower price so as to boost demand for its input. In effect, by engaging in cause marketing, the firm is able to make the supplier a tacit (even if unwilling) partner in corporate philanthropy.”
In other words, Yoplait must demand the best pricing from its milk and fruit providers because it is donating $0.10 per lid redeemed. Arya and Mittendorf say that even if the cause marketing promotion doesn’t improve sales volume, “the firm’s bottom line is improved by targeted philanthropic activity.”

They also advise companies not to make their cause marketing universal. By sacrificing the profit margin on the product with the cause-marketing tie-in you can run up the margin on other products because of the firm’s overall lower supplier costs. So Campbell’s Labels for Education and General Mills’ Boxtops for Education are probably too broad to benefit from supply side cost savings.

Old gray-haired cause marketers like yours truly always said that cause marketing was especially well-suited for highly competitive markets because it helps firms stand out. But Arya and Mittendorf say that from a supply side point of view, competitive markets have probably already wrung out most of the costs savings out of suppliers. Cause marketing is therefore less likely to help in competitive markets.

There’s a lot of counter thinking here, making the paper an interesting read. I use the term ‘read’ advisedly since I’m not qualified to comment on Arya and Mittendorf’s mathematical model.

But as a gray-haired cause marketer it reminds that cause marketing has long been about power relationships. In the early days of cause marketing, which was dominated by consumer packaged goods (CPG) promotions at retail, stores would give preferred placement to CPG companies that ponied up cash donations to preferred charities. That kind of promotion is less common today. It’s considered unethical by many store chains. But as with Arya and Mittendorf's paper it does show you who has the power.

Comments

David Hessekiel said…
Paul,
At first I was excited to see your write-up of this research, but when I read the paper itself it turned out to be a totally theoretical piece of work with no effort to substantiate the hypothesis with real world examples of better input pricing obtained by cause marketers.
The researchers could have substituted any form of promotion (entertainment tie-in, premium) that increased a marketer's costs and assumed that the marketer would go back to suppliers to demand better input pricing.
Am I missing something?
Hi David:

No, I don't think you're missing something. What the authors did is a fancy thought-experiment, leaving it to others to parse out actual proof.

Thanks for your comment, brother.

Warm regards,
Paul

Popular posts from this blog

Three Ways to Be Charitable

I’ve spent a big chunk of my career working with or for charities. Many of my dearest and ablest friends are in the charity ‘space.’ And the creativity and problem-solving coming out of the nonprofit sector has never been greater.  Although I’ve had numerous nonprofit clients over the last decade or so, I haven’t worked in a charity for about 12 years now, which gives me a certain distance. Distance lends perspective and consequently, I get a lot of people asking me which charities I recommend for donations of money or time. My usual answer is, “it depends.” “On what?” they respond. “On what you want from your charitable activities,” I reply. It sounds like a weaselly consultant kind of an answer, but bear with me for a moment. The English word charity comes from the Latin word caritas and means “from the heart,” implying a voluntary act. Caritas is the same root word for cherish. The Jews come at charity from a different direction. The Hebrew word that is usually rendered as charity is t…

Top Eight Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns of 2007

Yeah, You Read it Right. It's a Top 8 List.

More cause-related marketing campaigns are unveiled every day across the world than I review in a year at the cause-related marketing blog. And, frankly, I don’t see very many campaigns from outside North America. So I won’t pretend that my annual list of the top cause-related marketing campaigns is exhaustive.

But, like any other self-respecting blogger, I won’t let my superficial purview stop me from drawing my own tortured conclusions!

So… cue the drumroll (and the dismissive snickers)… without further ado, here is my list of the eight best cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007.

My list of the worst cause-related marketing campaigns of 2007 follows on Thursday.


Chilis and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
I was delighted by the scope of Chilis’ campaign for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. As you walked in you saw the servers adorned in black co-branded shirts. Other elements included message points on the Chilis beverage coas…

Five Steps To Nurture a 30-Year Cause Marketing Relationship

Last Monday, July 22, 2013, March of Dimes released the annual results of its campaign with Kmart... now in its thirtieth year... and thereby begged the question, what does it takes to have a multi-decade cause marketing relationship between a cause and a sponsor?

In the most recent year, Kmart,the discount retailer, donated $7.4 million to the March of Dimes, bringing the 30-year total to nearly $114 million. March of Dimes works to improve the health of mothers and babies.

Too many cause marketing relationships, in my estimation, resemble speed-dating more than long-term marriage. There can be good reasons for short-term cause marketing relationships. But most causes and sponsors benefit more from long-term marriages than short-term hookups, the main benefit being continuity. Cause marketing trades on the trust that people, usually consumers, put in the cause and the sponsor. The longer the relationship lasts the more trust is evidenced.

There's also a sponsor finding cost that…