Skip to main content

Cause Marketing to Build Customer Loyalty

Suppose you face a fiercely competitive consumer-facing marketplace that was once a served by a regulated monopoly. How would you compete?

In the deregulated Georgia natural gas market, one company is using cause marketing.

In 1997 the Georgia Public Service Commission deregulated the natural gas market. The former monopoly, Atlanta Gas Light Company now provides only the pipes. The price of gas is no longer determined by regulators but by the market. The State has certified 11 natural gas marketers to sell to and service the market.

Not surprisingly those 11 compete on price, rebates, add-ons, promotions, and customer service. That’s because the gas is exactly the same no matter who markets it. And the delivery of the gas is still handled by Atlanta Gas Light Company, no matter who markets it.

My many astute readers are probably asking where the money comes from for the marketers to be so aggressive. The answer is that there’s a monthly access fee of about $45 apart from the cost of gas.

To this outsider it doesn’t look very different than the satellite TV market, which is delivered by Dish and DirectTV, but sold by numerous independent local marketers.

That kind of competition can be a kind of a merry-go-round. The customers churn a lot. They chase bargains. They’re literally being paid not to be loyal.

One of these Georgia gas marketers… Fireside Natural Gas… is trying to get off the merry-go-round with a cause marketing approach. From February 21 to February 28, 2011, Firesides’ Facebook page accepted nominations for one charity to receive $1,000 donation. From March 1 to March 15, 2011, Fireside wants you to friend them and vote on one the nominees.

I like the idea of Fireside using cause marketing to build loyalty. But there’s almost nothing in the way they’ve approached it that’s likely to build loyalty, including the paltry donation amount.

My hope is that Fireside will keep at it long enough to either figure out a more effective approach, or that they hire some professional help.


Tip of the hat to Kate L.

Comments

I appreciate Kate’s analysis of FireSide’s cause marketing effort. As the President and Owner of FireSide Natural Gas, I’d like to make a few comments. First of all, there are nine (not eleven) marketers in the market. The other two (along with many others) left Georgia long ago. Secondly, the most aggressive “churn” gas marketers in Georgia are also the ones with the most customers (FireSide is the smallest marketer in Georgia). By the way, the largest marketers in Georgia also have a long history of reporting the most expensive natural gas prices to the Georgia Public Service Commission. Additionally, it’s not the “access fee”, as Kate suggests, that creates the dollars for the aggressive “churn” campaigns. It’s the higher margins from higher gas prices that pays for it all.

Most importantly, FireSide has engaged in cause marketing because we feel great about giving back to the Georgia communities that we serve. FireSide has put no internal value on building any loyalty through this effort and may choose to give away more in a later campaign depending on the feedback from our fans. We have a very loyal customer base with virtually no churn because we consistently have the lowest natural gas price each and every month. We also send an accurate invoice and answer the phone very quickly when a customer calls. I can’t think of a better way to build loyalty because I have found over the years, low pricing and excellent customer service is what customers really want.

We chose this particular cause marketing effort to introduce ourselves to anyone who feels that it’s important for a company to give back. It has nothing to do with loyalty. In a best case scenario, a prospective customer might take the time to get to know us and potentially want to do business with us and a charity gets a thousand bucks. In a worst case scenario, a charity gets a thousand bucks and maybe Fireside will be seen as a company that cares. Either way, everyone wins. Isn’t that the true definition of cause marketing?

Mike Davis
President/Owner
FireSide Natural Gas
Marietta, GA
mike@firesidenaturalgas.com
Paul Jones said…
Hi Mike:

Thanks for your comments. The post and the analysis was all mine. Kate lives in the market and she merely introduced me to the campaign.

Glad to get corrected on the number of gas marketers.

I'm surprised to hear that it's not the access fees (or whatever they're called since you put the phrase in quotation marks) that generate the margin for the marketing. But you're looking at the earnings spreadsheet and I'm not, so I'll defer to you.

I'm glad that you chose cause marketing. But there's nothing wrong with having a business goal behind it, whether it's customer loyalty or something else.

Thanks for your comments.


Warm regards,
Paul

Popular posts from this blog

Cause Marketing: The All Packaging Edition

One way to activate a cause marketing campaign when the sponsor sells a physical product is on the packaging. I started my career in cause marketing on the charity side and I can tell you that back in the day we were thrilled to get a logo on pack of a consumer packaged good (CPG) or even just a mention. Since then, there’s been a welcome evolution of what sponsors are willing and able to do with their packaging in order to activate their cause sponsorships. That said, even today some sponsors don’t seem to have gotten the memo that when it comes to explaining your cause campaign, more really is more, even on something as small as a can or bottle. The savviest sponsors realize that their only guaranteed means of reaching actual customers with a cause marketing message is by putting it on packaging. And the reach and frequency of the media on packaging for certain high-volume CPG items is almost certainly greater than radio, print or outdoor advertising, and, in many cases, TV. More to

Why Even Absurd Cause-Related Marketing Has its Place

Buy a Bikini, Help Cure Cancer New York City (small-d) fashion designer Shoshonna Lonstein Gruss may have one of the more absurd cause-related marketing campaigns I’ve come across lately. When you buy the bikini or girls one-piece swimsuit at Bergdorf-Goodman in New York shown at the left all sales “proceeds” benefit Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center . Look past the weak ‘ proceeds ’ language, which I always decry, and think for a moment about the incongruities of the sales of swimsuits benefiting the legendary Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer has nothing to do swimming or swimsuits or summering in The Hamptons for that matter. And it’s not clear from her website why Shoshanna, the comely lass who once adorned the arm of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, has chosen the esteemed cancer center to bestow her gifts, although a web search shows that she’s supported its events for years. Lesser critics would say that the ridiculousness of it all is a sign that cause-related marketing is

A Clever Cause Marketing Campaign from Snickers and Feeding America

Back in August I bought this cause-marketed Snickers bar during my fourth trip of the day to Home Depot. (Is it even possible to do home repairs and take care of all your needs with just one trip to Home Depot / Lowes ?) Here’s how it works: Snickers is donating the cost of 2.5 million meals to Feeding America, the nation’s leading hunger-relief charity. On the inside of the wrapper is a code. Text that code to 45495… or enter it at snickers.com… and Snickers will donate the cost of one meal to Feeding America, up to one million additional meals. The Feeding America website says that each dollar you donate provides seven meals. So Snickers donation might be something like $500,000. But I like that Snickers quantified its donations in terms of meals made available, rather than dollars. That’s much more concrete. It doesn’t hurt that 3.5 million is a much bigger number than $500,000. I also like the way they structured the donation. By guaranteeing 2.5 million meals, the risk of a poor