Four studies have come out this year that aim to measure either directly or obliquely consumer’s attitudes towards cause-related marketing. All the studies have confidence levels of 95 percent or more. And yet two of them suggest that consumers have jaundiced opinions of cause-related marketing and two find that they’re quite positive on the practice. How could that be? The four studies are: “Rethinking Corporate Responsibility” from the PR firm Fleishman-Hillard and the National Consumers League, and conducted by Western Wats. “Consumer Survey: Media Use, Holiday Trends, Cause-Marketing” commissioned by the American Marketing Association , and conducted by the Opinion Research Corporation. “2007 Cone Cause Evolution Survey” from Cone, LLC, an advertising agency, and also conducted by the Opinion Research Corporation. The most recent is from Edelman, also a PR firm, in support of the launch of its new consultancy Good Purpose, and called the Goodpurpose Consumer Study. All the studies...
Dedicated to highlighting and dissecting the best and the worst cause marketing promotions and campaigns.